dallasfaniac
Active Member
- Messages
- 4,198
- Reaction score
- 1
superpunk;1724897 said:Now I know how other teams felt when we trotted out Hutch and Anthony Wright.
I think both of them attempted more than 2 passes per half though, lol.
superpunk;1724897 said:Now I know how other teams felt when we trotted out Hutch and Anthony Wright.
superpunk;1724897 said:There was nothing to be afraid of, ever.
superpunk;1724897 said:Good summary. That's probably my fault, didn't take the thread title into account when posting, knowing that that's all some people read before posting in a thread. That's exactly what I meant. We didn't stop trying, or start loafing - we just scaled things back and let the markedly superior talent take over. Instead of getting cute and chhucking the ball ANOTHER 30 times in the second half, we just marched out and showed how much better we were than the competition.
Call it what you will - I call it an easy ***-kicking. That was gravy. There was nothing to be afraid of, ever. Now I know how other teams felt when we trotted out Hutch and Anthony Wright.
jackrussell;1724848 said:Crapping in late on this one, but I've read every post.
Just so I have this right, and DO correct me if I'm wrong...it is suggested Dallas called off the dogs, while they were behind, then, took a 10 point lead and resorted to a conservative game plan to secure the victory.
In my estimation, that is playing not to lose....and there are a whole lotta people here that despised that last year.
But now it's a good thing.
Alrighty then.
Chocolate Lab;1724886 said:It reminded me of when a good sprinter is in a big race and gets beat out of the blocks. The best ones don't panic and tense up, which is the worst thing you can do. They just relax and run their race, knowing that their speed is going to overtake the guy by the finish.
I think some people are misinterpreting "calling off the dogs", as meaning that we just took it easy on them. What I took it to mean is that we didn't panic when we were behind. We just calmly went about our business, knowing that we were a superior team and that we'd win in the end.
Dave_in-NC;1724409 said:Championship teams, don't call off the dogs.
iceberg;1724387 said:i do and that's why winning by *only* 10 doesn't bother me. it was good to see the gound game eat up the clock, however.
superpunk;1724402 said:Yeah.
That's why these "disappointment posts" are especially unfathomable to me today. Did these people not see how badly we dominated the Vikings? How we trashed them, and beat them up, and had them cringing every time Marion came on the field?
This was an ***-whoopin'. That 10 points might as well have been 50.
Crown Royal;1724408 said:In my thread I talked about some things we and the players did that I didn't like, but I should have added that while at the game, I never really got the feeling we were in trouble or were going to lose. The Vikings play a ball control game, but they never controlled the clock. Our defense stopped them too much and our offense was eventually going to get something. The blocked kick and return was gravy and allowed us to settle down.
I think we played sloppy some, but I think we also dialed it in to an extent, if that makes sense.
Dave_in-NC;1724409 said:Championship teams, don't call off the dogs.
THEHEREAFTER;1724405 said:I don't feel like Garrett ever "called off the dogs." We just took what was given and played the clock and circumstance. We only lead for 7 and 10 for much of the second half. The clock became our friend and the defense was playing well. Also, Witten missed an easy catch that could have kept a drive alive on third down. I just think Romo didn't want to force anything.
trickblue;1725182 said:Sure they do... we regularly did that in the early 90's. Landry did it as well...
Dave_in-NC;1725202 said:We were dominant back then. I don't think we are at that point yet.
CoCo;1724861 said:Most of what we saw in Buffalo was just "one of those nights" and yet I think part of it was a reminder of Romo's somewhat reckless abandon style and his relative NFL game inexperience. I think the coaches are keeping a close eye on Tony and are willing to pull in the reins a bit (for him and the team) if it looks like things are getting a bit too frenetic.