CowboysFaninHouston
CowboysFaninDC
- Messages
- 33,942
- Reaction score
- 19,492
zekeWhat weapons did Dak have against the 49ers? Name them.
zekeWhat weapons did Dak have against the 49ers? Name them.
Yep, their are folks locked into both sides....much like there are members here that will defend Dak no matter what he does.
was trent dilfer a superbowl calibur QB?Question:
Dak Prescott is a decent QB. He is not a Super Bowl caliber QB. You would have to surround him with HoF caliber players on offense and at a minimum have a top-five elite defense to have a chance. In fact, it may not even matter how good the defense is or how good the other 10 players of all offense are, you are still stuck with a QB that makes bonehead decisions under pressure. For comparison, Troy Aikman did not have regular season HoF stats. He did, however, play his best football during the playoffs. He thrived under pressure. How many chances are you going to give Dak before you realize he just doesn’t have” “it”? How many players’ careers are being wasted because we don’t have a Super Bowl caliber QB. It won’t surprise me if Parsons demands a trade when he sees the **** show of a team he’s on. I’m still a fan, but I’m also very realistic. The bottom line is Dak needs everything to be perfect for him to succeed. Adversity in the regular season is not the same as during the playoffs. In fact, we are seeing the Dak has already hit his ceiling and is starting to regress.
teams like Philly with Nick Foles? if only teams with Elite QBs win championships, then there is only 3 teams in a decade that have a chance and everybody else should just pack it in. no?I don’t think even his biggest detractors would deny he’s “decent”.
The issue is we’re in a league where teams with elite QBs win championships, and Dak has never been and will never be elite.
If he went on a 2012 Flacco run, or we had a stupidly good defense like the 2000 Ravens, he could win a Championship. But it’s stupid to waste time and resources trying to make that scenario come into fruition instead of looking to upgrade the QB - the most important position on the field.
and there are those who will say it was the other team's defense playing bad no matter what he does....much like there are members here that will defend Dak no matter what he does.
I think the flexibility can be had but when the personal attacks and insults start that's the end of that.Yep, their are folks locked into both sides.
Shame more can't be a little flexible mentally round these parts.
Luckily we have you to remind us of this and be all indignant like Doris Day catching Rock Hudson with two young ladies.
OMG, not another Dak thread....here come the usual suspects... Iover/under is at 15 pages
Agreed, and there is no need for that.I think the flexibility can be had but when the personal attacks and insults start that's the end of that.
Hadn't we been hearing all season long how Brady and Rodgers were done for. So Dak beat an ancient goat on his last legs that should've thrown the towel in this season. Let's not let that be our superbowl. Dak is good enough for the regular season, but doesn't have enough leadership skills to get a team that already has leadership problems from the coaching staff focused enough to play playoff football. Wildcard rounds you encounter a lot of teams that shouldn't have been there either.BS. He destroyed the GOAT in the playoffs. Against the 9’ers he lost his second best weapon, only had 1 legitimate WR and the offensive lineman played poorly. All this caused Dak to play poorly. This is a very naive and uninformed take.
Why? Why? Are you just bored? Were you so bored that you just had to open the door and let the dogs out again? Why, man?!The Dak haters and Dak stans have their talking points, but what it seems to boil down too is this: Dak is an excellent regular season QB that simply fails in the playoffs. Nothing more, nothing less. It is his track record. Not winning enough in the playoff’s doesn’t mean he sucks. It means that he isn’t good enough when the stakes at highest. He is our Kirk Cousins.
Although I have supported Dak in the past, perhaps it’s time to move away from “good but not good enough.” But in reality, I see no options for this year other than stay the course and hope. I‘d like to see us draft a QB next year.
Brady was the 2nd best QB last year.Hadn't we been hearing all season long how Brady and Rodgers were done for. So Dak beat an ancient goat on his last legs that should've thrown the towel in this season. Let's not let that be our superbowl. Dak is good enough for the regular season, but doesn't have enough leadership skills to get a team that already has leadership problems from the coaching staff focused enough to play playoff football. Wildcard rounds you encounter a lot of teams that shouldn't have been there either.
He’s top 10. That is a statistical fact and a consensus to most who cover and play the game.The Dak haters and Dak stans have their talking points, but what it seems to boil down too is this: Dak is an excellent regular season QB that simply fails in the playoffs. Nothing more, nothing less. It is his track record. Not winning enough in the playoff’s doesn’t mean he sucks. It means that he isn’t good enough when the stakes at highest. He is our Kirk Cousins.
Although I have supported Dak in the past, perhaps it’s time to move away from “good but not good enough.” But in reality, I see no options for this year other than stay the course and hope. I‘d like to see us draft a QB next year.
Preach!
Dak is more than a decent quarterback and would be able in many franchises to get to a super bowl.
Dak is not able to overcome Jerry and the front office and I don't know of any other quarterbacks that could knock it out of the park with Jerry in charge.
You can't expect to win a super bowl no matter what quarterback you are with a front office that just cares about winning enough to stay relevant.