RustyBourneHorse
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 40,786
- Reaction score
- 46,896
Keeanu Benton in the 2nd round
Benton or Dexter please and thank you
Keeanu Benton in the 2nd round
I thought I read that the average per carry improved once we added Hankins from over 4 per carry to somewhere in the 3.6 range. I could be wrong.The defense yards per carry given up was about the same with Bohanna or Hankins in the lineup. Bohanna just missed a lot of time due to injury.
The other DTs weren't as good against the run as those two. They were both good. Not dominant but good.I thought I read that the average per carry improved once we added Hankins from over 4 per carry to somewhere in the 3.6 range. I could be wrong.
Is there a rumored cost out there? I missed it.Too costly to trade for Deforest Buckner.
Who is in a panic?Our moron front office is probably in a panic.
Keandre Coburn.Well, technically we've got the depth to fill his spot, but I do think last season showed that the defensive coaches weren't satisfied with Gallimore and Bohanna, so I do think we'll draft a DT somewhere between the fourth and seventh rounds.
Looks like Cowboys will have to address DT early in the draft after all.
yep...same way they signed on this Watkins,.. they can sign on another Watkins,..Didn't say I was happy with it. I said how I believe Dallas looks at it. They signed Hankins, so they are covered at starting NT. Odighizuwa is the starting 3-tech. Golston came on as a 5-tech. They are not looking at starters. They are looking at backups, and especially when it comes to NTs, they have shown that they are not going to look early.
I believe the team even gave some praise to Gallimore this offseason, so I don't really know if the Joneses were all that concerned with keeping Watkins. Wouldn't be surprised if his deal is close to the same range as Hankins, which was barely above the minimum.
Plus, I believe their run defense improved quite a bit after acquiring Hankins, so I think they saw him as the key re-signing there.
They were barey adequate with Hankins AND Watkins.not with Hankins signed
Or probably in the bargain FA vet pool again ...the same way they gain Watkins ..the same way they will acquire another cheap vet bargain Watkins again.Hankins isn't a three-down guy and depth matters. Watkins' spot will need to be filled, probably in the draft.
Forgot about the Alarcon switch. There's our backup NT depth, says Jerry and Stephen.As I expected Alarcon is coming on super strong so they let Watkins go...
Seriously, Wat was playing good at the end of the season, and the coaches sat Galli and Bo for him and Chauncey in the playoffs, our DT depht is going to be challenged, even with Hank on board.
I hope they take the position seriously for once and get a player or two.
Gallimore is not good...Not really. NT Hankins and 3-tech Odighizuwa are the starters and Golston and Gallimore are contributors. We also have Bohanna as the backup NT, but don't think we're too thrilled about that, so we'll take another NT stab late in the draft.