Cardinals sign former Cowboys DT Carlos Watkins

Robster8989

Well-Known Member
Messages
447
Reaction score
540
I'm actually a little bummed to see this.
I think Watkins was a great 5th IDL to carry.
Once we brought him in last year, and we had Hankins manning 1 tech, I saw a lot more from Watkins.
I think before we were trying to use him at the 1 and he just wasn't quite big enough, but once he started playing more 3 he flashed a lot more. I think a guy like that is a great 5th guy to carry inside, he can play either position.
I was hoping we'd have Hankins and maybe a FA at 1, Osa and an upgrade from the draft at 3, then Watkins as our DT rotaion.
I think it was a mistake to lose him. Not the end of the world, but a small mistake nonetheless.
 

Rayman70

Well-Known Member
Messages
35,095
Reaction score
34,005
I'm actually a little bummed to see this.
I think Watkins was a great 5th IDL to carry.
Once we brought him in last year, and we had Hankins manning 1 tech, I saw a lot more from Watkins.
I think before we were trying to use him at the 1 and he just wasn't quite big enough, but once he started playing more 3 he flashed a lot more. I think a guy like that is a great 5th guy to carry inside, he can play either position.
I was hoping we'd have Hankins and maybe a FA at 1, Osa and an upgrade from the draft at 3, then Watkins as our DT rotaion.
I think it was a mistake to lose him. Not the end of the world, but a small mistake nonetheless.
I agree. He was at his best late in the year. This might hurt us. if AShawn is available, GET HIM. We have a need suddenly.
 

Praxit

Well-Known Member
Messages
12,737
Reaction score
13,814
..wow, I thought Watkins would be re signed. oH well.
 

Risen Star

Likes Collector
Messages
89,030
Reaction score
211,152
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
Left gaurd???
Would be the next biggest need but they could always shift Tyler over to play it if they had to. DT has no such option. You have a good backup in Osa, an aging Hankins who is still decent and nothing else.
 

Kingofholland

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,484
Reaction score
6,970
The silver lining here is the Cowboys may now prioritize DT. Watkins was a solid rotational player, but they can go try to find their war daddy now, lol
 

charron

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,407
Reaction score
14,821
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
Hankins may not last 17+ games and watkins wasnt anything special. They need another run stopping DT. While id love a guy who can get pressure up the middke they are rare but theyd still need a guy who can power into double teams, get off blocks and still make some tackles.
 

DCreppinBoysfan

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,033
Reaction score
4,006
Not really. NT Hankins and 3-tech Odighizuwa are the starters and Golston and Gallimore are contributors. We also have Bohanna as the backup NT, but don't think we're too thrilled about that, so we'll take another NT stab late in the draft.
Gallimore is just a body. He don’t contribute nothin for the cowboys. I’m getting tired of this fallacy being passed around here
 

Robster8989

Well-Known Member
Messages
447
Reaction score
540
Gallimore is just a body. He don’t contribute nothin for the cowboys. I’m getting tired of this fallacy being passed around here
Yes, I agree.
If we go into the season with Osa/Hankins/Bohanna/Gallimore/Golston we failed in the off season.
To me, Hankins is a part of the solution at the 1 tech. Solid contributor/role player. But Bohanna is barely an NFL player IMO. Maybe he improves in his 3rd season, but we need another guy, either in FA or the draft, who gives us another proven NFL body at the 1. Bohanna could certainly compete for snaps too, but I want another guy there.
At 3, Osa is a proven player IMO. Gallimore is barely an NFL player IMO. Golston is interesting, he has shown things at times (and he is cheap, which Gallimore is no longer)
My hope in the off season was keep Hankins and Watkins, Osa/Golston/Bohanna are all cheap, then add a 1 tech and a 3 tech in either the draft or FA. Cut Gallimore and save his 3 million. That money could pay for Hankins, Watkins and a draft pick. Go into camp with 7 guys competing for 5 slots. (Hankins/FA signing/Bohanna as your 1's, and Osa/Golston/Watkins/Draft pick at the 3). Keep 5 on the 53 and the other 2 on IR/PS for depth.
We can still get there, minus Watkins of course.
I liked Watkins, but his loss is not catastrophic. He was a just a guy and can be replaced.
I saw his contract was 1 year 1.75 mil. We may have felt that was too high for a 5th IDL.
We have the draft soon, and there are still guys unsigned now, and will be more after the draft, so let's see how this position developes
I remain hopeful..
 

Mitch

Member
Messages
58
Reaction score
54
Just sign Poona Ford and move on… My guess is we‘ll wait how our draft will fall.
 
Top