RonnieT24
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 13,611
- Reaction score
- 21,702
Yeah, numbers sound good.
QBs numbers should directly translate into more Ws imo but here there is an always an accountability problem.
Do an "every offensive snap plus/minus" All22 breakdown. Focus on 3rd downs.
Challenge yourself to delve deeper. When are points scored. When are they not. What opponents are being played.
Is the oline getting beat every single play?
Could an audible have been made to a hot route?
Was one receiver stared down?
Is that still the same fundamentally flawed footwork from MS State.
Wow, there was separation there on the replay, why didn't he throw that into that window?
It's a little thing called context.
He still does the exact same stuff he ever has.
You're another guy who believes he has magically morphed into a high volume Big 12 type guy when nothing could be further from the truth.
The winning formula is the 2016 way. The way that Tennesse is doing it with Tannehill and Henry. The problem is THAT oline and THAT RB are long gone.
Just compare his simple stuff. Touchdown to int ratio against poor teams and against good teams.
And then....
Drum roll.
Convince yourself that the one person touching every snap and getting paid the Lions share of his entire team's payroll is not somehow responsible for wins and losses and not just your fantasy football numbers.
Or maybe consider 160 mil spent couldn't have been used on the defense that you are blaming for all the losses while paying a lesser QB salary or drafting one to accomplish the SAME most important thing. And that is Wins.
I mean, Kirk Cousins has really nice end of year stats every year, right?
No worries.
Im about the team.
Many here are about the player.
To each their own.
I'm sorry I must have missed the championship parades the Titans have been throwing with Henry and Tannehill. Since you are so hung up on how much of team's payroll would you then concede that since 2020 was the only year Dak was the team's highest paid player he was NOT responsible for wins and losses before 2020? And since he didn't play in 11 of those games he certainly could not be considered responsible for those right? Dak wasn't making 160 million when the defense was pooping the bed the last two years so that's a specious argument. If you think Dak is the same QB that he was 5 years ago then fine.. That's your right. Dak has been a good QB from the start and I fully expect him to continue to be.. In fact I expect him to keep getting better. You want somebody else at QB.. Fine.. buy the team and install your guy.. I'm going to go ahead and root for the guy we HAVE at QB to be great and hope his teammates quit pissin down their legs as often as they have been.