SDogo;4378703 said:I'm going to assume you have google because just for craps and giggles I tried it and with in 1 minute there were a dozen stories about it before I even stopped looking.
I mean if you want to hear the recount of when it came to lite just read this.
http://www.jsonline.com/sports/badgers/79373317.html
About as much energy as I'll put into it.
GloryDaysRBack;4378711 said:so you cant find a draft source that brings to light this condition that he has..thanks
ufcrules1;4378708 said:Our biggest shortcoming on the offensive line? Or on our whole team? I hope you are just talking about the line. Our biggest glaring needs would be the secondary, followed by the defensive line, THEN the offensive line.
Idgit;4378701 said:I mean overpay relative to how much we're already going to have to overpay. But, I agree. We need to sign a top OG in FA.
Re the draft, I agree with others that it's a lot to over-invest in OL, but I'd rather we take players who are bluechippers at their respective positions than get the third-rated CB or a pass rusher who didn't separate himself sufficiently from players that are going to be selected 10-20 spots below him. It always depends how the board breaks, but doubling up on OL isn't the worst thing in the world.
juck;4378712 said:Imagine our running game with Nicks and Decastro. Lordy Lordy. We need a FS in FA and we need to draft a starting CB.
cowboys#1;4378710 said:can carl nicks cover the middle when you know thats were they're going with an extra timeout?
derp
CCBoy;4378629 said:Due to the recent Collective Bargaining, rookie contracts aren't in the breath taking gulp area for linemen. That means that a few years are given to prove out and also be integrated to a broader view of where in cap management they deserve place. It's a very workable picture now.
GloryDaysRBack;4378721 said:I agree w you completely! the guy i want the most is DeCastro..because he is one of the 5 best players in this draft...I dont think we are going to take him, even if he is available though..I think we are going defense no matter what
Risen Star;4378718 said:Incorrect.
The biggest issue this team has it's failure to win at the line of scrimmage on a weekly basis.
ufcrules1;4378708 said:Our biggest shortcoming on the offensive line? Or on our whole team? I hope you are just talking about the line. Our biggest glaring needs would be the secondary, followed by the defensive line, THEN the offensive line. Our Oline ranked #13 in the league last year. It NEEDS to improve but it isn't even close to our biggest shortcoming.
We just saw an offensive juggernaut team go down last night. They had the best offensive line by far and it still wasn't enough to get them to even the championship game of their division.
Risen Star;4378718 said:Incorrect.
The biggest issue this team has it's failure to win at the line of scrimmage on a weekly basis.
GloryDaysRBack;4378694 said:Show me a draft source that mentions it..preferably one that brings to light the severity of it
Ok fine, we look elsewhere. We need help in other spots too. Go get a DB or S in the first round, draft a guard in the 2nd round and so on along with Nicks.Risen Star;4378682 said:Yeah but I think he's right. A big FA signing at G would probably make us look elsewhere in the draft. It's not about what's the rational thing to do. I could easily see the Jones' twins thinking improvement from within can fill that other G spot.
Randy White;4378727 said:It's not the money ( the 14th pick's salary cap impact is very managable, if not right down negligible ), but it's the pick itself that represents the value. If they sign Nicks, that would represent a significant portion of the available resources targeted for the guard position. Drafting DeCastro too, although incredibly tempting, would also represent an even a bigger portion of the available resources spent on just one position. That's not a wise strategy when there are other positions that desperately need talent.
Available resources is not just money and/or or salary cap space. It's also draft picks.
TheSport78;4378734 said:True, but I think that had to do with New Orleans' defense being so terrible. You can get by with an average defense, only if you have a prolific offense, which we don't have. We're a solid offensive line from having a prolific offense. I really hope Jerry realizes that.
hutch1254;4378743 said:Take a look at his Bio on the Badgers website. The words injury or due to injury comes up every year except his red shirt season. It will be talked about in April. "He has great talent, great ability but injury is a concern..." will probably be a common phrase coming out of Kipers mouth. And then there's the chest pain thing.