CBS Top 100 Players (Dak 49)

[McKDaddy]

The false equivalence is drawing up a similarity between Dak and Kirk based on stats.

Kirks stats are better than nearly all the QBs. Does that mean he's Top 5? Top 6? Because there aren't 5 or 6 QBs with better stats than him.

No......because most of his stats are meaningless. It's against the Lions and Bears. Anytime he's in the Primetime window his stats regress below his mean because he doesn't play well in games people actually see.

Dak might play badly in the playoffs but in the regular season Primetime he usually shines.

I completely agree stats are not the be all end all. I was replying to AC who was saying that Dak was a much better QB than Kirk. The stats nor the eye test bear that out.

My point is that many devoted Dakvidians point to his good stats to say he's a great QB but outright dismiss players like Kirk who have almost exactly the same stats. Dak is just better somehow. Yet they don't like when other people refer to the eye test.

Fairness demands that if you argue one thing for or against in regards to one player, then that should be your position across the board. Right?

I think both benefit from playing in a pass happy league & weak divisions. We could go back & forth on who has done what against whom.

At the end of the day, if we agree they are very similar QB's I think we have reached a reasonable conclusion.

 

[KJJ]

Don't blame me for being in tune with the times. Dak is ranked anywhere from 5-8 on ANY site. Its an accepted opinion by football publications. Not based on trolls who drop random comments on YouTube.

You’re wasting your time trying to talk any sense with him. lol A lot of trolls come here to drop ridiculous comments about Dak. You have knuckleheads on this board who think great QBs are a dime a dozen. They think it’s as simple as drafting another QB and bingo!

 

[Mk2_Cowboys]

Just 7 QBs ahead? Laughable. He can’t win in post season Even when his team is favored.

 

[Typhus]

It's literally only a collection of weirdos on this board who don't know Dak's a top 10 NFL QB.

It's common knowledge to everyone else.

It's common knowledge to everyone that this is a QB starved league, even average QBs get paid.

I could care less about the money, caving in on term with a 4 rather than 5 year, cost Jerry a lot more than the cash on his last contract.

Language is everything and sadly Dallas FO has been dropping the ball on several contracts, CD should have already been done.

I would love for anyone in this entire forum to explain the game plan, you do not spend the draft capital to obtain a true numero uno WR and after his breakout season not already have him extended with some Jefferson money.

It is very difficult to find a top WR that controls the edge like Lamb now in his prime, so just pay the man already and lock him down with a good contract and term.

CD is my number one priority if Jerry and Stephen have an ounce of common sense.

 

[Yobwocs]

You’re wasting your time trying to talk any sense with him. lol A lot of trolls come here to drop ridiculous comments about Dak. You have knuckleheads on this board who think great QBs are a dime a dozen. They think it’s as simple as drafting another QB and bingo!

He seems to give off know it all vibes. I wonder if he realizes how didactic he is.

Pondering about QB upgrades by imagining QBs already in the league on the Cowboys is the first thing wrong with his line of thought

 

[Vtwin]

He seems to give off know it all vibes. I wonder if he realizes how didactic he is.

How ironic.

 

[CowboysFaninHouston]

Just 7 QBs ahead? Laughable. He can’t win in post season Even when his team is favored.

so how do the ones that are ranked below him compare? and since you seem to be challenging that, why are they better? or is it just another opinion?

 

[Mk2_Cowboys]

so how do the ones that are ranked below him compare? and since you seem to be challenging that, why are they better? or is it just another opinion?

You have to factor in how much QBs cost and or what they have accomplished in post season.
Mahomes
Allen
Burrow
Stafford
Lamar
Love
CJ Stroud
‘Herbert
‘Purdy
‘Goff
‘have all either won more than he has in post season or cost waaaaaay less . Dak isn’t even top ten.

 

[CowboysFaninHouston]

You have to factor in how much QBs cost and or what they have accomplished in post season.
Mahomes
Allen
Burrow
Stafford
Lamar
Love
CJ Stroud
‘Herbert
‘Purdy
‘Goff
‘have all either won more than he has in post season or cost waaaaaay less . Dak isn’t even top ten.

what? that wasn't my question.

of course a rookie cost less. well duh...

and what has herbert accomplish? Lamar? he is only one loss behind Dak...woohoo, one of the most over rated QBs in the NFL.

you went all over the place with your response. what does cost have to do with how well you play? there are back up QBs that cost minimum salary, does that put them on this list?

 

[Motorola]

It's the league's perennial "rankings \ ratings" period.
How much stock- belief each fan places in the several dozen inputs put forth thus far - and ongoing throughout the rest of summer...they all take a back burner once camp starts.

 

[Mk2_Cowboys]

what? that wasn't my question.

of course a rookie cost less. well duh...

and what has herbert accomplish? Lamar? he is only one loss behind Dak...woohoo, one of the most over rated QBs in the NFL.

you went all over the place with your response. what does cost have to do with how well you play? there are back up QBs that cost minimum salary, does that put them on this list?

Dak is tied for the worst post season win percentage in nfl history minimum 7 starts . He sucks. How’s that for a more focused response?

 

[LACowboysFan1]

Dak #49?

That's impossible, he sucks, is the worst qb in the league. Right? No player that bad can even be in the top 300, surely.

What were the people who came up with the list thinking?

 

[CowboysFaninHouston]

Dak is tied for the worst post season win percentage in nfl history minimum 7 starts . He sucks. How’s that for a more focused response?

is he worse than some that have 6 starts? or 5 starts? or 4 starts. or no starts because they never made it to post season.

its a bit strange qualification.

and you still never responded to my above question, you factored in cost. which is a mixed bag because everyone is in different place in their career and their earnings.

but I get it, you just wanted to hone in on Dak statement above, everything else was just fluff to get to this.

yes, Dak post season performance sucks. and I guess based on your statement, wins and losses in post season are all on QB. nothing else matters.

 

[CowboyFrog]

Dak is tied for the worst post season win percentage in nfl history minimum 7 starts . He sucks. How’s that for a more focused response?

I mean your pic gives me an idea of why Dak sucks...does 2016 give you a "Laces out!!!" moment? Ray Finkle would approve...