America's Cowboy
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 37,081
- Reaction score
- 50,599
You still don't get it. The Steelers have a much better team than we do. Yet, which QB (Russell Wilson or Dak Prescott) helped lead their team to a win at Pittsburgh when our Cowboys played them earlier in the season?A lot of us suggested going after Russell Wilson earlier and basically letting Dak rot on the bench in the final year of his contract and use Wilson to bridge the gap until we can draft a franchise qb.
And the same posters ridiculing you in this thread ridiculed that idea relentlessly.
Meanwhile the Steelers got him for vet minimum ($1.2 million) this year.
6 starts he's averaging 270+ ypg. 10 TD, 3 int and a rating over 104.
Point being no matter what idea you bring to the table to replace the guy they think is irreplaceable, they'll dismiss it immediately and act like it's ridiculous and never own it when they are clearly proven wrong.
This idea that "if Dak can't do it nobody can" is basically a mental illness at this point. Just remind them we could have had Russ for a million bucks this year, but they and Jerry thought it would be better to pay Dak a guaranteed $231 million over 4 years. Then laugh like hell at them and move on.
Had Dak had a much better team (better Oline, more than just 1 WR threat, a actual Running game and a Defense), this team would have a much better record than 5-7 which they have right now. Half of our losses have been within a TD or less. We would likely have an 8-4 record right now.