burmafrd;1527775 said:Goodell had a lot of conversations with the Players Board, Upshaw and the owners. Fuzzy, do you really think he did not check with them FIRST to see what they considered acceptable? AND they are what matters- not what you think.
Bob Sacamano;1527773 said:and conduct detrimental to the league's image
burmafrd;1527775 said:Goodell had a lot of conversations with the Players Board, Upshaw and the owners. Fuzzy, do you really think he did not check with them FIRST to see what they considered acceptable? AND they are what matters- not what you think.
FuzzyLumpkins;1527779 said:The kids that I used to tutor were in regular classes but were in a program to help them get into honors classes so they really did try but they sure did pick up on things faster than you do.
FuzzyLumpkins said:I conceded a long time ago that Goodell was withing his contractual rights to act. That is not why I am criticizing him.
Bob Sacamano;1527771 said:so all laws were done on a whim w/ no logical reasoning?
burmafrd;1527785 said:So fuzzy you are setting yourself up to say what is right and wrong. A little arbitrary, isnt it?
Bob Sacamano;1527784 said:another personal attack?
so slandering Goodell isn't criticism?
FuzzyLumpkins;1527786 said:arbitrary does not mean illogical. try again. you really dont know what it means.
Fuzzy, what Goodell has, in the form of the NFL conduct policy, is reality personified. You're reaching with this fantasy contract between Hos and me. And besides, Hos won't kick me it the nads, would ya Hos?FuzzyLumpkins;1527774 said:i conceded that he was completely within his contractual rights to act. if there was a contract out there that said Hos could kick you in the nads i would still think Hos wasnt nice if he kicked you in the nads.
burmafrd;1527789 said:So now you are an expert on the US Constituition?
FuzzyLumpkins;1527779 said:The kids that I used to tutor were in regular classes but were in a program to help them get into honors classes so they really did try but they sure did pick up on things faster than you do.
I conceded a long time ago that Goodell was withing his contractual rights to act. That is not why I am criticizing him.
FuzzyLumpkins;1527790 said:No its an factual observation. Those kids picked up on things faster than you do. Draw your own conclusions.
FuzzyLumpkins said:plus slander involves speaking, youre thinking of libel and where am i sladering him?
DallasEast;1527792 said:Fuzzy, what Goodell has, in the form of the NFL conduct policy, is reality personified. You're reaching with this fantasy contract between Hos and me. And besides, Hos won't kick me it the nads, would ya Hos?
Hos?
Hos?
HOSTILE!!!
Bob Sacamano;1527797 said:I picked up on Goodell cracking down to repair the league's image, which you haven't
saying he sees guilt in cases that haven't even gone to trial yet is a pretty strong thing to say about someone
I never said that you weren't entitled to your opinion--only that none of our opinions will factor into what Goodell has and/or will do concerning enforcement of the NFL conduct policy at all.FuzzyLumpkins;1527798 said:you can call it a reach all you want but its a reasonable analogy. just because a contract gives someone the right to do something does not mean that it is good or right that they do. i hope i am entitled to my opinion on the matter.
he couldve watied two months still hammered johnson quickly and done it right.