Chris Simms has Dak 8

Status
Not open for further replies.

acr731

Jerry learned to GM from Pee Wee Herman
Messages
10,085
Reaction score
27,974
:clap:No QB and that's capital NO can alone take a team to a Super Bowl. Hell, if it was that simple only 2-3 would win it every year.
Yet when KC lost Tyreek Hill there were several posters here who said their run was done. Mahomes is going to get exposed after losing his top receiver.

KC has won 2 straight WITHOUT Hill.

QB makes a difference.......... I'm not saying Mahomes did it on his own, but I would bet everything that KC doesn't win squat if Dak is their QB.
 

Adreme

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,892
Reaction score
3,704
Nope. Stafford has won a SB, and Jackson has made it to a conference title game.

Herbert is only in his 5th season.

If Dak was top 10 we would have made it to at least one conference title game. Had chances with a 13-3 one seed, and a 12-5 two seed. A top 10 QB would have made it at least one of those times.
Wins not being a QB stat is really perfectly shown by Stafford. Do you believe Stafford was the best QB he had been in his entire career at age 33? Prior to that he had 3 playoff appearances and no playoff wins.
 

DallasEast

Cowboys 24/7/365
Staff member
Messages
61,988
Reaction score
63,120
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
AC will like your post.

That will confirm that you’re wrong.

Birds of a feather.
Opinions are wrong. Thanks for the newsflash.

You are the anti-America's Cowboy of CowboysZone. Your quantity and texture of posts fall on the opposite side of the coin from his. Both of your relative protagonist/antagonist agendas are the exact same from totally different personal objectives EXCEPT you post WAAAAAAY less videos to 'prove' your stance, lol.
 

MountaineerCowboy

Well-Known Member
Messages
29,419
Reaction score
72,957
Opinions are wrong. Thanks for the newsflash.

You are the anti-America's Cowboy of CowboysZone. Your quantity and texture of posts fall on the opposite side of the coin from his. Both of your relative protagonist/antagonist agendas are the exact same from totally different personal objectives EXCEPT you post WAAAAAAY less videos to 'prove' your stance, lol.
You’re pandering to the losing crowd.

You’re pandering to the people going down with the ship.

It’s not admirable or brave.

Dak will be gone eventually, but who you chose to defend and pander to will remain.
 

DallasEast

Cowboys 24/7/365
Staff member
Messages
61,988
Reaction score
63,120
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
You’re pandering to the losing crowd.

You’re pandering to the people going down with the ship.

It’s not admirable or brave.

Dak will be gone, but who you chose to defend and pander to will remain.
You are dense.

You pander to a 'side' that requires zero pandering.

It is illogical and transparent.

Prescott will be gone but you will simply move on to another agenda.
 

MountaineerCowboy

Well-Known Member
Messages
29,419
Reaction score
72,957
You are dense.

You pander to a 'side' that requires zero pandering.

It is illogical and transparent.

Prescott will be gone but you will simply move on to another agenda.
Of course I will.

If the next guy sucks then I will want him gone also.

I’m not satisfied with the Cowboys simply taking part. I’m only satisfied if they take over.
 

DallasEast

Cowboys 24/7/365
Staff member
Messages
61,988
Reaction score
63,120
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
Of course I will.

If the next guy sucks then I will want him gone also.

I’m not simply with the Cowboys simply taking part. I’m only satisfied of they take over.
No need to confirm what anyone would know based on your posting pattern.

Plenty of your fellow posters would want the next sucky guy gone also. They would again make their opinions known with far less fervor than you and your exact opposite do on a daily basis.

I will agree with you about the Cowboys taking over. It has been far too long since that was last true. And I could not care less who the quarterback will be who can help make that happen.

Why? Because both my nearly zero daily posts and your bountiful number of daily posts about Dak Prescott will have no impact on who that quarterback shall be.

You two keep your agendas alive and kickin', lol.
 

MountaineerCowboy

Well-Known Member
Messages
29,419
Reaction score
72,957
No need to confirm what anyone would know based on your posting pattern.

Plenty of your fellow posters would want the next sucky guy gone also. They would again make their opinions known with far less fervor than you and your exact opposite do on a daily basis.

I will agree with you about the Cowboys taking over. It has been far too long since that was last true. And I could not care less who the quarterback will be who can help make that happen.

Why? Because both my nearly zero daily posts and your bountiful number of daily posts about Dak Prescott will have no impact on who that quarterback shall be.

You two keep your agendas alive and kickin', lol.

What’s the point of a Cowboys forum if not to talk about the Cowboys and their players?

Dak is the QB. He will be talked about the most.

The next QB will be talked about the most also.

I don’t know what to tell you except being on the losing side is not the right move.

Jump off the RMS Dak. They hit an ice berg called Green Bay and it’s barely poking out of the water now.
 

blueblood70

Well-Known Member
Messages
42,054
Reaction score
28,647
I'm not even clicking that cause it's not worth my time it's just another Prescott thread another quarterback thread another whose opinion means more thread however and he is number 8 that's insane should be the NFL he finishes in the top three last year and somehow this year he's 8 no he's still top five in the entire NFL until proven otherwise.... The bias and hate continue the man was the MVP last year in my opinion just like Luca got ripped off this year there seems to be a Dallas bias.. I mean all the great quarterbacks we've had isn't it odd and maybe I'm wrong but none of our quarterbacks have ever won an MVP I mean how is that possible??

I can tell you why voting is subjective people's eyes and their opinions are completely subjective and there is an underlying bias even if it's below the surface maybe they're not even aware of it it's subconscious... They're trying to appease the masses so when these lists come out or these ridiculous awards come out you can see the bias and you could just get right past it like me and I really don't care what people think Prescott deserves to be called top five this year isn't that how it works like the year before in college how the teams finished a start with the rankings this year similar because they have no other data to support anything else this year same way with the strength of schedule what does that really matter for 2024 but they start predicting things off last year so why isn't Prescott in the top five he basically finished third in the league in most categories and some #1 how could the number one scoring guy and according to the masses with not a lot of help from the GM not a lot of talent not a lot of depth finish number two overall basically as a quarterback second team all pro start out eight this year??

Nah nope ...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top