Chris Simms has Dak 8

Status
Not open for further replies.

JW82

JJ21
Messages
6,287
Reaction score
10,364
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
LOL......the problem with postseason rankings it could be anywhere between 1-4 games. Not to mention different values for wildcard winners vs divisional or championship games as well as Super Bowls. Hint.....there is a reason why it is never done (lol)
Yup. So it has to be considered, which then makes him a middle of the road qb.
 

McKDaddy

Well-Known Member
Messages
9,574
Reaction score
10,259
Let's say Dak doesn't get an extension. The more valid question is where will he rank at the end of the upcoming season.

There has been a lot of turnover in the QB world over recent years. Being top 10 in a world without Brady, Brees, Rivers, Luck, Rothleisberger and with aging \ injured superstars like Rodgers & Wilson isn't a terribly high bar.

With some of the younger QB's seemingly coming into their own, they will likely push the guys that "have to be discussed" down to where they belong.

Let's see how he handles the pressures of a one year deal & a fan base that is largely ready to move on. If he truly likes betting on himself, there will be no better time.
 

DallasEast

Cowboys 24/7/365
Staff member
Messages
61,988
Reaction score
63,120
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
What’s the point of a Cowboys forum if not to talk about the Cowboys and their players?

Dak is the QB. He will be talked about the most.

The next QB will be talked about the most also.

I don’t know what to tell you except being on the losing side is not the right move.

Jump off the RMS Dak. They hit an ice berg called Green Bay and it’s barely poking out of the water now.
Dude, you are dense. Discussion does not require anyone becoming zionist with their opinions about Dak Prescott. Some members, like you and America's Cowboy, are so caught up within your extraordinary feelings about him, that you developed 'sides' as if it makes any difference in the real spinning world.

I have simply pointed out to you the same as I have pointed out to him in the past. You are both going full out on a topic everyday to beat down anyone you think is either a Hatfield or a McCoy. And you are both doing it on an internet fansite. AND you both think you will beat the other 'side' into eventual submission.

Meanwhile, the guy signing Prescott's checks could not care less about petty verbal squabbles on a forum. If anything, the ire about retaining or ejecting Prescott from the team should be directed at HIM. You know. "The guy who has kept the sulky guy far longer than you and others want." Nope. It's some faceless folks you want to save from drowning on 'their side'.

That is your Sunday through Saturday crusade on CowboysZone. Or perhaps the perspectives from the 'sides' is that this is actually the DakZone.
 

MountaineerCowboy

Well-Known Member
Messages
29,419
Reaction score
72,957
Dude, you are dense. Discussion does not require anyone becoming zionist with their opinions about Dak Prescott. Some members, like you and America's Cowboy, are so caught up within your extraordinary feelings about him, that you developed 'sides' as if it makes any difference in the real spinning world.

I have simply pointed out to you the same as I have pointed out to him in the past. You are both going full out on a topic everyday to beat down anyone you think is either a Hatfield or a McCoy. And you are both doing it on an internet fansite. AND you both think you will beat the other 'side' into eventual submission.

Meanwhile, the guy signing Prescott's checks could not care less about petty verbal squabbles on a forum. If anything, the ire about retaining or ejecting Prescott from the team should be directed at HIM. You know. "The guy who has kept the sulky guy far longer than you and others want." Nope. It's some faceless folks you want to save from drowning on 'their side'.

That is your Sunday through Saturday crusade on CowboysZone. Or perhaps the perspectives from the 'sides' is that this is actually the DakZone.
AC approves.
 

America's Cowboy

Well-Known Member
Messages
36,694
Reaction score
50,177
Dude, you are dense. Discussion does not require anyone becoming zionist with their opinions about Dak Prescott. Some members, like you and America's Cowboy, are so caught up within your extraordinary feelings about him, that you developed 'sides' as if it makes any difference in the real spinning world.

I have simply pointed out to you the same as I have pointed out to him in the past. You are both going full out on a topic everyday to beat down anyone you think is either a Hatfield or a McCoy. And you are both doing it on an internet fansite. AND you both think you will beat the other 'side' into eventual submission.

Meanwhile, the guy signing Prescott's checks could not care less about petty verbal squabbles on a forum. If anything, the ire about retaining or ejecting Prescott from the team should be directed at HIM. You know. "The guy who has kept the sulky guy far longer than you and others want." Nope. It's some faceless folks you want to save from drowning on 'their side'.

That is your Sunday through Saturday crusade on CowboysZone. Or perhaps the perspectives from the 'sides' is that this is actually the DakZone.
Uhhh, to be honest and fair, I have admonished Dak at times, especially concerning his greediness concerning a new contract extension. I'm not 100% on one side of the Dak spectrum like mountain goat is. lol
 

MountaineerCowboy

Well-Known Member
Messages
29,419
Reaction score
72,957
Uhhh, to be honest and fair, I have admonished Dak at times, especially concerning his greediness concerning a new contract extension. I'm not 100% on one side of the Dak spectrum like mountain goat is. lol
@DallasEast

Mountain goat? Really. You conjured up a personal name calling attack from AC. Good job.
 

blueblood70

Well-Known Member
Messages
42,054
Reaction score
28,647
Dude, you are dense. Discussion does not require anyone becoming zionist with their opinions about Dak Prescott. Some members, like you and America's Cowboy, are so caught up within your extraordinary feelings about him, that you developed 'sides' as if it makes any difference in the real spinning world.

I have simply pointed out to you the same as I have pointed out to him in the past. You are both going full out on a topic everyday to beat down anyone you think is either a Hatfield or a McCoy. And you are both doing it on an internet fansite. AND you both think you will beat the other 'side' into eventual submission.

Meanwhile, the guy signing Prescott's checks could not care less about petty verbal squabbles on a forum. If anything, the ire about retaining or ejecting Prescott from the team should be directed at HIM. You know. "The guy who has kept the sulky guy far longer than you and others want." Nope. It's some faceless folks you want to save from drowning on 'their side'.

That is your Sunday through Saturday crusade on CowboysZone. Or perhaps the perspectives from the 'sides' is that this is actually the DakZone.
Spot on but you have a good point there should be a dakZone and all DAK content that doesn't involve the team with it should go into a special place make them battle it out over there we don't always have to see it that when we open up the front page...lol this is a wild guess that I'm getting 75% of the post on the 1st 2 pages you know anything recent it's probably somehow found its way into a Prescott debate... It's like 6° of separation literally for always finds its way back..
 

charron

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,407
Reaction score
14,816
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
So subjective but I would put Dak next to Cousins below goff, purdy and love.
 

TheMarathonContinues

Well-Known Member
Messages
83,520
Reaction score
76,362
Nope. Stafford has won a SB, and Jackson has made it to a conference title game.

Herbert is only in his 5th season.

If Dak was top 10 we would have made it to at least one conference title game. Had chances with a 13-3 one seed, and a 12-5 two seed. A top 10 QB would have made it at least one of those times.
Flacco won a SB is he number 2?
 

NotForLong

Well-Known Member
Messages
9,575
Reaction score
10,508
Yet when KC lost Tyreek Hill there were several posters here who said their run was done. Mahomes is going to get exposed after losing his top receiver.

KC has won 2 straight WITHOUT Hill.

QB makes a difference.......... I'm not saying Mahomes did it on his own, but I would bet everything that KC doesn't win squat if Dak is their QB.
Not even a single playoff game
 

MountaineerCowboy

Well-Known Member
Messages
29,419
Reaction score
72,957
Extreme deflection. Where "technically" you win the argument. Hopefully this is the last year you get to spew this garbage
Best believe if the Cowboys ever win a Super Bowl with Dak (no chance) it would be “Dak won the Super Bowl” every chance they got.
 

NotForLong

Well-Known Member
Messages
9,575
Reaction score
10,508
Best believe if the Cowboys ever win a Super Bowl with Dak (no chance) it would be “Dak won the Super Bowl” every chance they got.
No doubt. They always cry that you are too extreme. But look at the ridiculous claims that come out of their mouths. They have been forcing you to respond in such a way for the last 8 years. While each year they move the goal posts

I know because they have been doing it to me
 

TheMarathonContinues

Well-Known Member
Messages
83,520
Reaction score
76,362
Yet when KC lost Tyreek Hill there were several posters here who said their run was done. Mahomes is going to get exposed after losing his top receiver.

KC has won 2 straight WITHOUT Hill.

QB makes a difference.......... I'm not saying Mahomes did it on his own, but I would bet everything that KC doesn't win squat if Dak is their QB.
Is that just Dak though? How many do they win with any qb not named Mahomes?
 

erod

Well-Known Member
Messages
38,546
Reaction score
60,113
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top