Jimmy G , Tannehill, Cousins would all get Dallas just as far as Dak has. But they might be able to get you one or two games further if they are lucky. But your not winning a SB with them. You put Herbert on this team and even though he hasn't won anything they would have a very good chance of going to the SB. You see Dak is who he is and it's not his fault but everyone has limitations and people refuse to see that Dak just doesn't have the physical or mental tools.
so you kind of trying to argue your point, but then you give yourself an out. read my other posts, perhaps these guys can produce similarly to Dak in Dallas. ALthough I think Cousins is a loser as he has had just as much, if not more in Minny and he has underwhelemed. he shrinks in big moments.
so on the one hand you declare confidently that they would all get dallas just as far as dak, then you say "if lucky" we get further. doesn't that same luck apply to Dak. do you think the way we looked against SF, as unprepared as we were, that the results would have been any different?
and again, with the herbert, et. al. ...... get me an herbert and then we talk, otherwise its just wishful thinking. this is not an argument that if this team would be better with Herbert, Rodgers, Allen, Mahomes or Brady. the answer is yes. but none of them are here. none of them will ever be here, none of them will hit the market. so why even argue or discuss that. unless you have a goal/agenda to just bad Dak because nothing else to discuss.....
yes, Dak has limitations. why is it that in your third/fourth response you keep bringing that up, eventhough we have agreed on that.... what's the point? are you looking for an argument?
you sound like you have no solution at all. all you want to do is bash Dak to make yourself feel better. so if that makes you feel better then Bash away. enjoy. is it going to change anything? I doubt it.
Ok, we can't win with Dak...great.....now what?
