Have the Seahawks signed Fred Jackson? Are they contemplating signing him?
I just wonder if we were to get Michael if then everyone would stop complaining about our running game, or if it would still be under the "sky is falling" rule?
Why would we want a RB that was displaced by a 34 year old RB?
I dont know much abou Michael; But if he can add some "real" depth, that would go a long way, imho....
Were most likely going to need it;
The main Seattle RB I am interested in is Thomas Rawls. If he is cut or goes on the practice squad. I am running to the phone to call his agent.
Depth is all we have. Our problem seems to be a lack of a clear starter. Not sure Michael would do anything to solve that.
We are going RBBC, without any real starter. Split carries between DMC/Randle. One of those guys cant go, then that RBBC isnt really much of a plan, considering it would be..........Dunbar? Johnson????