Church disrespect

StarBoyz83

Well-Known Member
Messages
18,303
Reaction score
12,840
First of all don't get me wrong This is not intended to negate wilcox. Both are ss types not fs. Sensabaugh is a better fs than those 2 so far and that's bad. Not saying wilcox cant surpass him. I love the toughness of wilcox that church doesn't seem to show. Wilcox is always in a scrum. But we have church under 3 mil a year and people act like a random guy from walgreens can do his job.

2013 tackles - church 107 next closest carter with 73

2014 tackles - 87 church next closest jj with 69

that is a sick ss rotation now if we use jones at fs or cb will decide a lot. I'm actually good with these 2 at fs and ss this year. These 2 are solid safeties and especially church.
 
I don't see anyone outright disrespecting him. Most of what I see people saying is that he is an average SS, which is the truth. Not even Church can argue that.

He just isn't the FS that some of us (including myself) hoped he'd turn out to be.
 
After he talked all that **** about Tate only to get abused, I was done with dude.
 
You know what defensive backs who can't cover get?

Lots of tackles. Because everyone keeps throwing the ball at them.

That's BS, and you know it. Rod has been running a lot of Cover 3 and Cover 1, which puts Church in the box. He is as solid as solid gets. He isn't flashy, but he does his job and cleans up. You rarely see him out of position, and you rarely see him give up a play. He is the quintessential working man. He goes to work, does his job, and goes home. Highly underrated, IMO.
 
You know what defensive backs who can't cover get?

Lots of tackles. Because everyone keeps throwing the ball at them.

Church also happened to miss a lot of tackles last season, too. Though he's generally a good tackler back there.
 
Church also happened to miss a lot of tackles last season, too. Though he's generally a good tackler back there.

All our DB's were slipping and sliding on that frozen tundra...
 
I don't see outright disrespecting him. Most of what I see people saying is that he is an average SS, which is the truth. Not even Church can argue that.

He just isn't the FS that some of us (including myself) hoped he'd turn out to be.

I agree but thats what I mean that he and wilcox are ss types. Church and oscan are the most solid players on d and people act like he shouldnt be in the nfl.
 
First of all don't get me wrong This is not intended to negate wilcox. Both are ss types not fs. Sensabaugh is a better fs than those 2 so far and that's bad. Not saying wilcox cant surpass him. I love the toughness of wilcox that church doesn't seem to show. Wilcox is always in a scrum. But we have church under 3 mil a year and people act like a random guy from walgreens can do his job.

2013 tackles - church 107 next closest carter with 73

2014 tackles - 87 church next closest jj with 69

that is a sick ss rotation now if we use jones at fs or cb will decide a lot. I'm actually good with these 2 at fs and ss this year. These 2 are solid safeties and especially church.

I quit reading at "sensabaugh was better". Good luck with what your selling. Not buying.
 
That's BS, and you know it. Rod has been running a lot of Cover 3 and Cover 1, which puts Church in the box. He is as solid as solid gets. He isn't flashy, but he does his job and cleans up. You rarely see him out of position, and you rarely see him give up a play. He is the quintessential working man. He goes to work, does his job, and goes home. Highly underrated, IMO.

Are you saying he doesnt get beat? Yea Lbers are supposed to make tackles. DBs, in my opinion, should be able to prevent a pass to some degree..which Church rarely does. And as far as tackling goes Church had his share of broken ankles last year as well.
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
474,003
Messages
14,505,684
Members
24,207
Latest member
TomGiantsfan
Back
Top