CMike over Dunbar

Risen Star

Likes Collector
Messages
89,420
Reaction score
212,331
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
I'd trade all three of these running backs for 1 that can halfway play. If Michael has any ability whatsoever he needs to be on the field. At the expense of any of the three. They're all bums.
 

JohnsKey19

Well-Known Member
Messages
19,688
Reaction score
18,693
They're finally making good use of Dunbar now. To the point where teams have to account for him in the game-plan which is important.
 

Hailmary

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,117
Reaction score
1,870
How bout over Lucky or Butler?

This is my thinking. Dunbar should be viewed as a receiver who occasionally lines up at RB. So CMike can replace Dunbar and Dunbar over Whitehead and Butler. Makes sense seeing as how the coaching staff doesn't yet trust Lucky to return punts and it seems like it's going to take Brice a little while to learn the playbook enough to not be detriment on the field.
 

Boyzmamacita

CowBabe Up!!!
Messages
29,047
Reaction score
64,100
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
I'd trade all three of these running backs for 1 that can halfway play. If Michael has any ability whatsoever he needs to be on the field. At the expense of any of the three. They're all bums.

We should've got AP!!! Just kidding.
 

Boyzmamacita

CowBabe Up!!!
Messages
29,047
Reaction score
64,100
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
How about we have all four running backs active on game day? We're a different offense right now. The run game and short passing game will probably be our bread and butter. I say have them all active and cut back at some other position.
 

Tommy

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,221
Reaction score
2,982
That's what irritates me the most. Right now we have three very similar RB's on the roster and nobody to actually pound the rock like Murray did last year.

I'm all in favor of sitting either Randle or DMC and bringing in C-Michael to bring a physicality that we're missing now.

It's pretty sad that we have to revert to passing in 3rd and short due to having no active RB who we can rely on picking up the 1st.

The passing on 3rd and short is not because they have no confidence in the running backs. It is because the offensive line is not yet pushing people off the ball the way they did last year. Hopefully we will get back there.
 

BAZ

Drunken Mick
Messages
4,861
Reaction score
2,767
With Weeden in the game I want more Dunbar for dump off passes. And waiting for Michael to get up to speed on the playbook won't hurt, Butler looked lost at times.
 

RonSpringsdaman20

Hold The Door!
Messages
9,773
Reaction score
3,861
I'd trade all three of these running backs for 1 that can halfway play. If Michael has any ability whatsoever he needs to be on the field. At the expense of any of the three. They're all bums.

man you are harsh... but that being said i've never been a fan of "lets run cecil gray, a homeless guy, and a guy who smoke blunts for a living behind our line because the patriots do it" theory...So I get where you're coming from..... Give me a guy who no doubt can get the job done.... I grew up in the 80's, I've seen great backs, it's not just a dream, or a john madden reality.
 

superonyx

Well-Known Member
Messages
11,478
Reaction score
15,836
People on this board are against Michael just because other people are for him.
I don't see anyone lining up in support for Dmac. Yet if someone mentions sitting Dmac and giving those 6 carries to Michael people suddenly act like you are asking to replace Emmitt Smith for Michael.

I really don't see a huge difference either way. If Dmac or Michael get the 6 carries.
 

visionary

Well-Known Member
Messages
28,445
Reaction score
33,407
Actually I have to eat crow on Dunbar
He has produced and been a very important part of our plan
I would start C Mike as soon as he is ready over one of the other 2
 

CATCH17

1st Round Pick
Messages
67,663
Reaction score
86,202
man you are harsh... but that being said i've never been a fan of "lets run cecil gray, a homeless guy, and a guy who smoke blunts for a living behind our line because the patriots do it" theory...So I get where you're coming from..... Give me a guy who no doubt can get the job done.... I grew up in the 80's, I've seen great backs, it's not just a dream, or a john madden reality.


You don't get the job done when there is no space.

We aren't seeing the gaping holes from last year so far and our RB's have been productive from a yards standpoint.
 

joshjwp

Well-Known Member
Messages
473
Reaction score
364
I think CMike needs to be playing over Street. They need to just stop thinking that dressing 4 rb's is too many because of Dunbar as a rb. He's a WR who you can hand it to every once in a while. More like a poor man's Percy Harvin than a poor man's Reggie Bush.

Dress CMike and don't dress Street. Consider Dunbar a WR and you still have 3 RB's and 5 WR's. Street isn't giving us anything anyway and then we add the power running game but don't give up anything the other RB's are giving us. Simple.
 

gimmesix

Fat, drunk and stupid is no way to go through life
Messages
40,008
Reaction score
37,150
Dunbar's the last back on this roster he would replace.

Which is funny considering that so many were crying for him to be cut at the end of the preseason. My hope was Dallas would actually follow through on its plan for using him and it has so far.

If Michaels is activated, it needs to be at the expense of McFadden, who so far hasn't shown that he's anything more than the back he was in Oakland the past three years. In fact, his average is worse ... but we know it was all about that line.
 

Doomsday101

Well-Known Member
Messages
107,762
Reaction score
39,034
I have questioned Dunbar and true maybe McFadden can do the same thing but right now I continue to keep Dunbar active for the simple reason he is making big plays. You don't reward a player who is making big plays by benching him.
 
Top