CMike over Dunbar

CxC1993

Well-Known Member
Messages
557
Reaction score
380
Dunbar has been making nice plays. CMike may have a role sometime in the future, but right now Dunbar has been contributing to wins.
 

kevm3

Well-Known Member
Messages
9,826
Reaction score
12,862
I don't understand why we sign this guy and don't even try to get him on the field. If we had AD, last year's version of Murray or some other dominant back out there, I would understand, but at most, we're getting 'decent' performances from our run game when we're going to need phenomenal if we want to really do something this year. Keep Dunbar as a WR, which he is pretty much being used as anyways, deactivate Swaim or Lucky and give CM some carries and see how he loks.
 

Nightman

Capologist
Messages
27,121
Reaction score
24,038
How did this get to 5 pages. Dunbar has a unique role with this offense.

One of Randle-DMC-CMike needs to sit every week.

I would give CMike a chance this week and sit DMC.
 
Messages
6,246
Reaction score
9,276
Does re-signing Gus Johnson to the practice squad suggest they may activate C Mike this week? If not, not sure why we need another RB on the practice squad.
 

erod

Well-Known Member
Messages
38,705
Reaction score
60,327
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
Does re-signing Gus Johnson to the practice squad suggest they may activate C Mike this week? If not, not sure why we need another RB on the practice squad.

Michael is not on the practice squad.
 

Zekeats

theranchsucks
Messages
13,157
Reaction score
15,711
How did this get to 5 pages. Dunbar has a unique role with this offense.

One of Randle-DMC-CMike needs to sit every week.

I would give CMike a chance this week and sit DMC.

Someone made a good point on another site:

If both DMC and C-Mike where free agents when DeMarco left, which one would we have signed?
 

MichaelWinicki

"You want some?"
Staff member
Messages
47,997
Reaction score
27,917
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
It still comes down to the fact that none of us are seeing the practices... we have no idea how Michaels is performing there.
 

BigD_95

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,012
Reaction score
2,016
I would love to unleash CMike. This dude can be the horse we need to punish teams. DMC could be our Dunbar.

No Way. DMC can ride the pine. In the first two games he is the only one that didn't do much of anything. No way I sit Dunbar.
 

KJJ

You Have an Axe to Grind
Messages
62,177
Reaction score
39,427
I would replace McFadden who's averaging 2.7 a carry before I would replace Dunbar who's currently the Cowboys second leading receiver. He's made some big plays in the passing game and the Cowboys are going to need him because throwing to the backs is having to compensate for the lack of a running game we've had so far. We don't even know what Michael can do but I bet he can do more than McFadden has so far.
 

kevm3

Well-Known Member
Messages
9,826
Reaction score
12,862
Seeing what someone does in practice is overrated. Charlie Strong rode with Tyrone Swoops because he was getting it done in practice. When Heard got on field, it was a completely different story. Get Michael out there and let's see what he can do in a real game. Deactivate Swaim or Lucky for a game and let's see what he brings to the table. There are ZERO reasons not to.
 
Messages
6,246
Reaction score
9,276
Michael is not on the practice squad.

I know that. But he is practicing scout team now. So why do we need another RB on the practice squad (Johnson)? It could be because they plan to activate C Mike and don't want him to be running scout team anymore.
 

erod

Well-Known Member
Messages
38,705
Reaction score
60,327
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
I know that. But he is practicing scout team now. So why do we need another RB on the practice squad (Johnson)? It could be because they plan to activate C Mike and don't want him to be running scout team anymore.

They added Johnson because another team signed one of our linebackers.

The practice squad is constantly churning.
 

Doomsday101

Well-Known Member
Messages
107,762
Reaction score
39,034
I think Dunbar has been earning his playing time. I would like to see a bigger back in the lineup. The 1st and goal to goal from the 1 not being able to get the ball in was very disappointing and think a bigger back may have faired better in that situation. Instead we settle for 3
 

Sonny Koufax

Well-Known Member
Messages
336
Reaction score
286
with Dunbar playing so much WR in packages, we need to activate CMike as the third running back. Lucky hasn't been used much so if we need another WR because of injury during the game, Dunbar is it.
I think CMike adds a physicality that 21, 25 and even 20 don't have.
So in effect, we have 3 RBs active, 4 WRs active and Dunbar who can play both.
 
Messages
6,246
Reaction score
9,276
They added Johnson because another team signed one of our linebackers.

The practice squad is constantly churning.

Right, I just think it's odd to sign a RB if you already have 5 active (including Clutts). Unless you are preparing for C Mike to play, he can be the scout team RB. And then just sign another LB to replace the LB you lost (or a DL to replace Terrell McClain injury). Just reading tea leaves. You could be right that it means nothing.
 
Top