Coach Cupcake Strikes Again

[Beast_from_East]

Actually, yes you are. I called out nobody the article did. Not my fault if you do not like what someone else writes. Merry Christmas.

So I guess the thread title "Coach Cupcake Stikes Again" was written by somebody else also.



Just stop dude, you are being to embarrass yourself now.

 

[VietCowboy]

Talk about backtracking. Just man up to it. Calling a thread "Coach cupcake stirkes again" not only indicates being too quick to want to post something you don't even bother spell checking, and indicates your acknowledgement that Coach cupcake, aka Wade Phillips, striking again, is that he once again does something stupid and soft.



hmm, and my malwarebytes anti-malware is not allowing me to access the OP's article....

 

[FightingIrishman]

He is stupid and soft, but the title of the thread reflects the title of the article which is properly linked.

You guys are simply amazing sometimes.......

 

[cowboyfan4life_mark]

He is stupid and soft, but the title of the thread reflects the title of the article which is properly linked.

You guys are simply amazing sometimes.......

Hince your title...

 

[5Stars]

He is stupid and soft, but the title of the thread reflects the title of the article which is properly linked.

You guys are simply amazing sometimes.......

Hmmm, maybe I did mis-read you?

Perhaps it was intended to offend the coach from your perspective?

Why not just title the thread the same title as the article?

Something fishy going on here.

 

[LandryFan]

Your thread...wow, just wow!

 

[VietCowboy]

Title of article:Wade “Cupcake” Phillips Gives Cowboys Christmas Off

Title of Thread: Coach Cupcake Stirkes Again

...you spin it to be even worse than the original article. FAIL.

 

[iceberg]

He is stupid and soft, but the title of the thread reflects the title of the article which is properly linked.

You guys are simply amazing sometimes.......

so he's stupid and soft and you wrote your own derogatory title and you expect everyone to believe you were mad at the mean old reporter for picking on wade.

uh huh. "epic fail" has just been redefined.

 

[casmith07]

Not this again.

 

[The Emperor]

You're a sick **** if you want the Cowboys to practice ON CHRISTMAS DAY.

THERE HAVE BEEN ARMIES THAT HAVE SUSPENDED WARS TO CELEBRATE CHRISTMAS, AND YOU'RE GOING TO SIT HERE AND KVETCH OVER THE COWBOYS NOT PRACTICING ON CHRISTMAS DAY???

Anyone who gets agitated over this needs to see a therapist on the 28th. Seriously.

 

[Cover 2]

LOL this thread is awesome. You have a guy make a post, then he gets flamed for it, then he tries to claim he said the opposite of what he said. LOL.

 

[Bleu Star]

I agree. This thread is great Xmas Day entertainment.

 

[gimmesix]

Title of article:Wade “Cupcake” Phillips Gives Cowboys Christmas Off

Title of Thread: Coach Cupcake Stirkes Again

...you spin it to be even worse than the original article. FAIL.

Maybe "stirkes" is a good thing.

 

[casmith07]

Maybe "stirkes" is a good thing.

Three of them and you're out. This guy is swinging like the batters in that old Bugs Bunny cartoon where he pitched a screwball and they all struck out on one pitch.

 

[ThreeSportStar80]

Wow talk about this...


http://i137.***BLOCKED***/albums/q216/Dinero80/Overboard.gif

 

[adbutcher]

LOL this thread is awesome. You have a guy make a post, then he gets flamed for it, then he tries to claim he said the opposite of what he said. LOL.

spiked eggnog?

 

[thanh123]

[youtube]eGDBR2L5kzI[/youtube]

 

[Frozen700]

He is stupid and soft, but the title of the thread reflects the title of the article which is properly linked.

You guys are simply amazing sometimes.......

Fail....

u suck

 

[silverbear]

Fail for posting an article? Explain.

If you don't endorse the opinion expressed in the article, you failed to mention it... this leads us to believe that you do in fact believe what the author's premise...

 

[silverbear]

My only comment was WoW!! How can you imply that I did not think the article was ludicrous?

So, do you think the article is ludicrous, or not?? You've had multiple opportunites to explain your agenda, and still haven't done so...

"WoW" could be an indictment of the opinion expressed, or an endorsement of it...