Reverend Conehead
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 9,975
- Reaction score
- 11,884
Seven wins aren't out of the question. I would love them to prove me wrong, but I'm just not getting my hopes up.
The same team that we lost to, beat Rodgers in Green Bay in the snow. They were an easy dropped pick from going to the super bowl.
They were the hot team late and outside of the Rams, nobody stood a chance.
Then the Cowboys record was also deceptive because they were mostly healthy and were in an easy division.This the deceptive record was SF because they were injured most of the year in a tough division.
I thought they would beat the 49ers. So I guess I was deceived. Stupid me.
Then the Cowboys record was also deceptive because they were mostly healthy and were in an easy division.
It cuts both ways.
Yes. The Niners loss was easily predictable.
More like if all 3 teams Dallas GB and SF were healthy and all came in with the same record...most would have picked the SF to win those games as they were the better team.
Then the Cowboys record was also deceptive because they were mostly healthy and were in an easy division.
It cuts both ways.
I totally disagree because Jimmy G is viewed as the weaker QB of the three. He’s being replaced this season.
Im not sure it was CLEAR cut but most people saw that that game was not a good fit for the Cowboys team. Again i think most put way to much on the QB as SF clearly has a better overall team than both GB and Dallas last year if healthy.
But no one thought he would be the reason they won those games anyway....they all new it was the o-line and defense..this year the QB play for them wont be much better...and if they stay healthy they have a good chance to rep the NFC....
This is the reason why San Francisco was the underdog in all three of their playoff games despite being the hottest team entering the playoffs. Jimmy G is not a productive QB he’s a game manager. Trey Lance may end up not being any better and could possibly be worse but San Francisco views him as a more dynamic player. They gave up a lot to trade up for him a couple of years ago so they have to play him.
I’m far from miserable you’re the one complaining. Lol You don’t have to deal with me you can put me on ignore.
Their competition was in the playoffs, when it mattered most.
Coward would not mention the other teams in the NFC East if the Cowboys won Super Bowls. But he does mention it because they consistently lose in the playoffs
No probs, dude! I don’t use ignore much at all. To me, it’s kinda weak, like a cop out. Besides, you don’t seem NEAR as bad as some of these guys.
He can run, thats what they like for sure. Shanahan's run scheme just got much bigger.
You seem to view candidness as negativity. I didn’t create this thread I just gave an honest opinion. I don’t sugarcoat comments and pull punches when I come here. I don’t post what everyone wants to hear I keep everything real.
Not candidness itself, but consistently negative candidness kinda defeats the whole purpose of this to me. It’s a game, a hobby, a diversion—and continually apologizing or defending or slapping negative labels on it kinda dilutes the fun for many of us.