Fritsch_the_cat
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 3,749
- Reaction score
- 4,138
awe, you mad bro? I stated my opinion and I don't believe it to be racist or negative in connotation....if you feel this strongly, would the chiefs also need to change their name? Isn't the "chief" the person in charge? but, if you get upset with Commander, then you had better take offense to chief, brave, indian, etc....
"I am a red man. If the Great Spirit had desired me to be a white man he would have made me so in the first place. He put in your heart certain wishes and plans, in my heart he put other and different desires. Each man is good in his sight. It is not necessary for Eagles to be Crows. We are poor... but we are free. No white man controls our footsteps. If we must die...we die defending our rights." – Sitting Bull
One thing I can guarantee you is, those exact words never came out of Tantanka Iyotake's (Sitting Bull to you) mouth.
For one thing, he barely spoke English, so that is a translation of something he said, as close to how it would be said in english as possible. But it is hard to translate Native American language to English. Native American's didn't really have words to differentiate race. They had never needed them until Europeans arrived. So he would not have said "white man". He would have said "wasichu", which translates to "greedy", black men were also called "wasichu". Native Americans thought them just as odd. He would not have referred to himself as a red man either. He would have referred to himself as "Lakota", which like almost all Native American names, translated as best can be done, simply means "the people".