bb721
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 1,091
- Reaction score
- 1,496
I can guarantee you that I would not get knocked out. Commanders is a complimentary term used to express an Indian warrior.
Yes you would, and no it's not.
I can guarantee you that I would not get knocked out. Commanders is a complimentary term used to express an Indian warrior.
fair enough
edit: just to be clear, calling her a racist if she said that is fair enough, not what she said
Here is an article on Susan Harjo and her fight against the Skins and their little owner.
http://www.businessinsider.com/meet...andmother-who-just-beat-the-Commanders-2014-6
they should be able to name their product anything they see fit.
Last week, a Sports Illustrated/Marketing & Research Resources poll of NFL fans found that about four out of five do not regard "Commanders" as offensive. Similarly, an Associated Press poll of the broader public reported that 79 percent want the team to keep the name. An Annenberg survey of Native Americans conducted a decade ago reported just 9 percent of respondents judging the team's name "offensive."
Most of those "polls" are a crock.
http://newspaperrock.bluecorncomics.com/2013/10/why-native-polls-on-Commanders-are-bogus.html
Bullcrap. This movement seeks to eliminate all Indian names. Right now the focus is on the easiest target, the Commanders, but it is absolutely 100% false to suggest a simple change to Warriors or Braves eliminates the problem once and for all."Fighting Irish" is not racist. "Commander" is. See the difference genius. Call them the Warriors or Braves and no one even entertains the argument.
Bullcrap. This movement seeks to eliminate all Indian names. Right now the focus is on the easiest target, the Commanders, but it is absolutely 100% false to suggest a simple change to Warriors or Braves eliminates the problem once and for all.
Take note, those of you who root for the Braves, Black Hawks, Chiefs, Indians, Utes or Chippewas: your day is coming too.
Again, you're mistaken. As others have pointed out, this movement wants to end all Indian-related sports names. Right now the Commanders are the easiest target but you're deluding yourself if you think that's the end goal.Again, it's the word skin. Those names don't have that word. Just as if we were called the Dallas Whiteskins. Or Blackskins.
If you want to get technical with things, then look at how the term Cowboy originated. Oreo's ? Cookies right? Wrong. The definition in Webster's dictionary:
Definition of OREO
usually disparaging
Looks like we have to change that now too.
Again, you're mistaken. As others have pointed out, this movement wants to end all Indian-related sports names. Right now the Commanders are the easiest target but you're deluding yourself if you think that's the end goal.
Then why was "Sioux" so offensive it had to be removed?No you are. The movement against the name Commander is against the term Commander. That is what this thread is about.
Then why was "Sioux" so offensive it had to be removed?
They're not stopping at Commander.
http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.co...atent-case-urges-chiefs-to-change-their-name/
And I am accurately pointing out that this movement to get rid of "Commanders" has absolutely zero intention of stopping there. Fans of the Chiefs, Indians, Braves, Utes, Seminoles, Black Hawks, etc, better pay close attention.Again I am referring to the word skin and what this thread is about. Any term in the English language can be offensive to anyone. It only takes one person to be offended.