Congrats- Dak is currently 21st ranked in total qbr

[GimmeTheBall!]

You forgot to add taller than your pleeb. Stay mad keylanto.

Nah from the better life than you so I have you angry online people. Keep typing your mad replies pleeb so I can laugh at you. Jump Dak groupie.

I am beginning to . . . like you.
But tell me, when you laugh at me, a poor lad from the north end of Liverpool, do you laugh with gusto in a Falstaffian laugh, or do you laugh at me in a pedestrian way?


You do hurt me feelings when you laugh at me.

 

[percyhoward]

Yeah, that’s how season stats work.

For whatever that's worth.

 

[KJJ]

Yeah sure.


What does that have to do with anything?


You obviously don't know how rational argumentation works. I asked you to provide evidence to back up your claim. I'm not going to parse through a thread to search for said evidence.

You're one of those who scoffs at everything. Nothing dug up is going to convince you of anything. You're just looking to waste time. It's posters like you who come at me with BS and agenda's who don't know how to have rational arguments. That link I slammed you with from a thread 6 years ago proves you don't know what you're talking about. I was a Romo supporter from the day he became the starter in 06 and the link to that thread proves it. Start from the last page and see the many debates I had with those who wanted Romo gone. Being critical of his mistakes didn't mean I didn't support him. He was an excellent QB who had some warts. I never tore him down after wins and complained because he didn't play a perfect game. I've been critical of Dak and his mistakes. Does that mean I hate him and don't support him? Dak has his share of warts but we're winning games with him because he has some great intangibles.

You claimed I denigrated people who supported Romo which is totally false! Rolling my eyes to someone who claims they would risk losing a SB with Romo over a guaranteed SB win with Dak isn't criticizing them. Fans say anything when they know these fantasy scenario's will never happen. You must really be wearing some blinders if you haven't seen some of this stuff. There isn't a QB that's ever played the game that I would risk losing a SB with if I was "guaranteed" to win a SB with another QB. You won't bother searching any threads trying to find posts to fit your agenda because you know none exist. You're the one who responded to me. If you're not interested in having a constructive discussion move on.

 

[KJJ]

Funny none of the people irl that I do business with have this perspective but you do because I don't want to go along with your bs. Online posters I tell ya.

The record is good but he himself isn't playing better. I see you're another one of these qb "record" people smh. You don't know other fanbases like this one so I wish you and others would stop the bs there isn't other fanbases like this one myth. Go be a Dak homer nobody is stopping you. I think he Alex Smith at best you don't like that then that's your pov.

It's obvious the people you do business with aren't anymore clued up about football than you are. If you don't think Dak is playing better the second half of the season than the first half then you're wearing blinders. The record improved the second half of the season because the addition of Cooper helped improve Dak's performance...FACT! There's a reason the Cowboys made that trade and it paid off. The receivers we had weren't getting it done and Dak needed some help. If you don't think Dak improved the second half of the season compare his numbers the first 8 games with his numbers the last 7 games. Dak had four 200 yard games the first 8 games with 255 yards being his best. The last 7 games he's had six 200 yard games with 455 yards being his best. Dak had 1660 yards passing the first 8 games and 1838 yards the last 7 games. He had 9 turnovers the first 8 games and 5 turnovers the last 7 games.

He only had 2 games the first 8 games with a passer rating over 100.0. In the last 7 games he's had 5 games with a passer rating over 100.0. In the two critical games against NO and Philly he had passer rating's of 115.6 and 104.9 with 4 TD passes. The best plays he's made this year were during the last 7 games when our season was on the line. When you examine his numbers and our record the last 7 games, it's more than obvious that he's played better the second half of the season than he did the first half of the season. How can you possibly say otherwise? You're either not a very educated football fan or your dislike for Dak as the Cowboys QB is so strong it won't allow you to see any good in his play. You're the true definition of a Dak hater.

 

[SultanOfSix]

You're one of those who scoffs at everything. Nothing dug up is going to convince you of anything. You're just looking to waste time. It's posters like you who come at me with BS and agenda's who don't know how to have rational arguments. That link I slammed you with from a thread 6 years ago proves you don't know what you're talking about. I was a Romo supporter from the day he became the starter in 06 and the link to that thread proves it. Start from the last page and see the many debates I had with those who wanted Romo gone. Being critical of his mistakes didn't mean I didn't support him. He was an excellent QB who had some warts. I never tore him down after wins and complained because he didn't play a perfect game. I've been critical of Dak and his mistakes. Does that mean I hate him and don't support him? Dak has his share of warts but we're winning games with him because he has some great intangibles.

You claimed I denigrated people who supported Romo which is totally false! Rolling my eyes to someone who claims they would risk losing a SB with Romo over a guaranteed SB win with Dak isn't criticizing them. Fans say anything when they know these fantasy scenario's will never happen. You must really be wearing some blinders if you haven't seen some of this stuff. There isn't a QB that's ever played the game that I would risk losing a SB with if I was "guaranteed" to win a SB with another QB. You won't bother searching any threads trying to find posts to fit your agenda because you know none exist. You're the one who responded to me. If you're not interested in having a constructive discussion move on.

For someone who has no time you sure fill it with a lot of fishing for red herrings.

 

[KJJ]

For someone who has no time you sure fill it with a lot of fishing for red herrings.

It’s obvious you initiated this just to stir things up and play a game of tag you’re it for several pages. If you want to carry on wasting time go ahead but I’m moving on to those who are interested in discussing football.

 

[SultanOfSix]

It’s obvious you initiated this just to stir things up and play a game of tag you’re it for several pages. If you want to carry on wasting time go ahead but I’m moving on to those who are interested in discussing football.

No I asked you to support your absurd general claim with actual evidence and you went on an obfuscation and red herring fishing expedition. And instead of answering the call you’re still engaging in it.

 

[KJJ]

No I asked you to support your absurd general claim with actual evidence and you went on an obfuscation and red herring fishing expedition. And instead of answering the call you’re still engaging in it.

You continue to ask me to waste time digging up old posts from the 2016 season with people asking if anyone would be torn if the Cowboys won the Super Bowl with Dak and not Romo because you don’t believe such posts exist. Lol Have you noticed you’re the only one that’s been bothered by this? You claimed I denigrated Romo supporters. Where’s your proof to support that? Instead of answering the call you’re still crying to see old posts from 2016 that you don’t believe exist.

 

[SultanOfSix]

You continue to ask me to waste time digging up old posts from the 2016 season with people asking if anyone would be torn if the Cowboys won the Super Bowl with Dak and not Romo because you don’t believe such posts exist. Lol Have you noticed you’re the only one that’s been bothered by this? You claimed I denigrated Romo supporters. Where’s your proof to support that? Instead of answering the call you’re still crying to see old posts from 2016 that you don’t believe exist.

No, I asked you a very specific request. You said that there were "several" Romo fans/supporters who said they would rather have the team lose in the playoffs or in the SB rather than have Dak play and win the Super Bowl. I asked you to name one, let alone "several". Instead of stepping up to the plate and providing such information, you started to obfuscate telling me to go dig and threw up red herrings. YOU'RE STILL DOING IT.

 

[atlantacowboy]

Dak is a winner, great leader but not a Prolific Passing QB. It’s really not that difficult to evaluate. Not sure why everyone gets so fussy about it?

Annointing him a "winner" is premature. Last I looked, this team is being lead by the defense not Dak.

 

[KJJ]

No, I asked you a very specific request. You said that there were "several" Romo fans/supporters who said they would rather have the team lose in the playoffs or in the SB rather than have Dak play and win the Super Bowl. I asked you to name one, let alone "several". Instead of stepping up to the plate and providing such information, you started to obfuscate telling me to go dig and threw up red herrings. YOU'RE STILL DOING IT.

You asked me a very silly request to dig up posts from three years ago because you’re more interested in engaging in a slap fight than having a football discussion. Your first response to me was complaining about the length of one of my posts to another poster. It was obvious from that comment you were itching to start a fight. Now you’re misquoting what I said. I never claimed that Romo supporters said they would rather lose in the playoffs or in the Super Bowl rather than have Dak play in a Super Bowl and win the Super Bowl. You obviously have issues with comprehension if that’s what you took from my comment.

Someone asked if anyone would be torn if we won a Super Bowl with Dak and not Romo. Several posted that they would be torn because they felt Romo deserved to win a championship. I asked some of these posters If they would risk losing in the playoffs or in the Super Bowl with Romo even if they were guaranteed a Super Bowl win with Dak and several said they would. You actually believe that’s far-fetched? Lol Do you not ever read this board? There’s comments posted on this board every day that are far more zany and wacky than that. You accused me of denigrating Romo supporters.

You called me out and I slammed you with a link to a thread from 2013 with me supporting Romo after his meltdown against Washington. Why don’t you step up to the plate and provide a post with me denigrating Romo supporters? If I call out another poster by name and accuse them of saying something and they denied it I’ll slam them with their quote. I’ve done it many times on this board. Instead of looking to engage in a flame war over something silly posters were discussing three years ago try getting back on the topic of this thread.

 

[SultanOfSix]

You asked me a very silly request to dig up posts from three years ago because you’re more interested in engaging in a slap fight than having a football discussion. Your first response to me was complaining about the length of one of my posts to another poster. It was obvious from that comment you were itching to start a fight. Now you’re misquoting what I said. I never claimed that Romo supporters said they would rather lose in the playoffs or in the Super Bowl rather than have Dak play in a Super Bowl and win the Super Bowl. You obviously have issues with comprehension if that’s what you took from my comment.

Someone asked if anyone would be torn if we won a Super Bowl with Dak and not Romo. Several posted that they would be torn because they felt Romo deserved to win a championship. I asked some of these posters If they would risk losing in the playoffs or in the Super Bowl with Romo even if they were guaranteed a Super Bowl win with Dak and several said they would. You actually believe that’s far-fetched? Lol Do you not ever read this board? There’s comments posted on this board every day that are far more zany and wacky than that. You accused me of denigrating Romo supporters.

You called me out and I slammed you with a link to a thread from 2013 with me supporting Romo after his meltdown against Washington. Why don’t you step up to the plate and provide a post with me denigrating Romo supporters? If I call out another poster by name and accuse them of saying something and they denied it I’ll slam them with their quote. I’ve done it many times on this board. Instead of looking to engage in a flame war over something silly posters were discussing three years ago try getting back on the topic of this thread.

The first quote I responded to is here. You can't even remember what you're talking talking about:

Congrats- Dak is currently 21st ranked in total qbr

That statement is completely different from what you're saying now.

 

[KJJ]

The first quote I responded to is here. You can't even remember what you're talking talking about:

Congrats- Dak is currently 21st ranked in total qbr

Your first response had nothing to do with the topic, you were looking to stir up trouble. Let it go! Stop trying to turn this thread sideways. You misquoted what I said and you know it! Go start your ****with someone else.

 

[SultanOfSix]

Your first response to me had nothing to do with the topic, you were looking to stir up trouble. Stop trying to turn this thread sideways. What is your problem, did you not get what you wanted for Christmas? Go start your ****with someone else.

Looking to start trouble? You're the one who keeps arguing because you can't admit that what you said is totally mis-representative of what you just claimed now, which was exactly my point. YOUR OWN WORDS PROVE IT. Yet now you're whining and crying about it.

 

[KJJ]

Looking to start trouble? You're the one who keeps arguing because you can't admit that what you said is totally mis-representative of what you just claimed now, which was exactly my point. YOUR OWN WORDS PROVE IT. Yet now you're whining and crying about it.

You’re the one who started this argument and refuse to let it go. What I said was a fact and I’m not about to waste my time digging through posts from three years ago with posters commenting on a scenario that would never happen. I could care less what you believe. I’ll make any wager you want that you’ll never find a post with me denigrating Romo fans because of their support for him.

 

[aaev84]

It's obvious the people you do business with aren't anymore clued up about football than you are. If you don't think Dak is playing better the second half of the season than the first half then you're wearing blinders. The record improved the second half of the season because the addition of Cooper helped improve Dak's performance...FACT! There's a reason the Cowboys made that trade and it paid off. The receivers we had weren't getting it done and Dak needed some help. If you don't think Dak improved the second half of the season compare his numbers the first 8 games with his numbers the last 7 games. Dak had four 200 yard games the first 8 games with 255 yards being his best. The last 7 games he's had six 200 yard games with 455 yards being his best. Dak had 1660 yards passing the first 8 games and 1838 yards the last 7 games. He had 9 turnovers the first 8 games and 5 turnovers the last 7 games.

He only had 2 games the first 8 games with a passer rating over 100.0. In the last 7 games he's had 5 games with a passer rating over 100.0. In the two critical games against NO and Philly he had passer rating's of 115.6 and 104.9 with 4 TD passes. The best plays he's made this year were during the last 7 games when our season was on the line. When you examine his numbers and our record the last 7 games, it's more than obvious that he's played better the second half of the season than he did the first half of the season. How can you possibly say otherwise? You're either not a very educated football fan or your dislike for Dak as the Cowboys QB is so strong it won't allow you to see any good in his play. You're the true definition of a Dak hater.

More time is needed on the Cooper factor imo. I'm interested to see what factor he plays in the playoffs and next year in the offense overall being more productive. The opposition always adapts in how they gameplan. Time will tell.

 

[KJJ]

Looking to start trouble? You're the one who keeps arguing because you can't admit that what you said is totally mis-representative of what you just claimed now.

What I said is what I’m saying now. You twisted what I said. Search this thread and dig up my original comment and post the LINK and it will prove that you twisted my words. I’m certainly not about to waste my time digging it up I’m here to discuss the topic. You certainly won’t dig it up because it will prove you wrong.

 

[KJJ]

Looking to start trouble? You're the one who keeps arguing because you can't admit that what you said is totally mis-representative of what you just claimed now, which was exactly my point. YOUR OWN WORDS PROVE IT. Yet now you're whining and crying about it.

If I can find a time this evening or tomorrow I’ll dig up my original comment with the link along with the comment you accused me of saying and prove that you twisted what I said. You’re already looking bad and are going to end up looking a lot worse when I get through with you. Lol I don’t need to go on a three-year search through old posts to prove I’m credible and you’re not. Everything I need is in this thread.

 

[SultanOfSix]

You’re the one who started this argument and refuse to let it go. What I said was a fact and I’m not about to waste my time digging through posts from three years ago with posters commenting on a scenario that would never happen. I could care less what you believe. I’ll make any wager you want that you’ll never find a post with me denigrating Romo fans because of their support for him.

If you make a claim, the burden of proof is on you. It's not on me to "go digging", nor to believe it is a "fact" just because you say so. If you don't want to back it up, then admit to it and move on. I said you "denigrated" Romo fans because you made an absurd general claim misrepresenting their position without evidencing it, effectively insulting their intelligence by stating that their emotional bias would cloud their judgement as reflected in choosing a guaranteed Super Bowl victory over a loss just because of who the QB is. Now you're trying to shift the argument onto proving that you "denigrated" them from what I asked you for in the first place which is based on you not providing such evidence.

 

[KJJ]

If you make a claim, the burden of proof is on you.

My claim didn’t involve the name of any posters. I didn’t call anyone out. You called me out and accused me of denigrating Romo supporters. The burden is on you to prove it. I already proved you a bold face liar with a link from 6 years ago with me supporting Romo against those who were not in support of him. You’re just digging a deep hole for yourself. The dirt will soon be thrown in on you.