How many teams have won or even reached a Superbowl over the past 10-15 years when they significantly overpaid at the quarterback position? There may be one but from memory the answer is a big fat zero. Stafford wasn't overpaid and is better than Prescott. Perhaps Peyton Manning at the Broncos but that really was an anomaly with a fantastic defense. The % call is to not overpay for the Prescott's and Cousins in the league.
It's pointless me aftertiming and providing a list of all the players the Cowboys could have signed but the reality is that a Superbowl winning team typically needs every single piece they can get hold of to get over the hump. You look back at past winners and there are plays made by key pieces brought in or retained.
I would much rather have a QB like Sam Darnold earning chicken feed or a rookie quarterback surrounded by a bucket load of talent than Prescott without a load of extra talent because of his contract. The salary cap is real.
You are blinded by thinking Dallas Cowboy fans are obsessed with how much Prescott earns - I couldn't care less. It's telephone numbers to me. I care about the team winning and being successful in the play offs.
You disagree which is fair enough everyone is entitled to an opinion but my view is that paying Dak Prescott $60 million a year with $231 million guaranteed over 4 years with a no trade clause was a horrific decision that will effectively act as a progress stopper for the whole team especially when he's so injury prone at this point in his career. He's a walking hospital.
a lot of them have ....there was argument, hey the Giants paid Eli and he is making 16% of the cap and they will not win the superbowl...and just like that a couple of years later, he wasn't counting 16% of the cap and they won the superbowl...people tend to bring this argument because they only look at the year of the contract not percentage of cap each year.....KC handed Mahomes a 450M contract at the time the highest paid....yet since then they have won the superbowl and been to another one a few times...why? because the cap goes up, but contract doesn't....
Stafford was paid....and so in your second sentence you kind of contradicted yourself...... stafford was highly paid, they did win the superbowl......
now, this is not an attestment to say we should pay Dak....its that the salary cap can be managed. if you have the right GM. salaries are what they are. QB market is what it is. so often people get confused between average salary, salary in a specific year and keep going back to the original contract value average and the cap in that year.
and I find it funny, people always jump on the latest band wagon that's up front. nobody and I mean nobody ever this off season mentioned Sam Darnold, but now every says hey I got the crystal ball and I rather have Darnold.
and the last problem is the bucket of talent. our drafts have been bad and we don't spend in FA. so where is this bucket? what talent have we wanted to keep and couldn't? if anything we handed out large contracts to some players that actually didn't deserve it. I can't recall one player we have wanted to keep and couldn't. and one player in FA that we really wanted, but Joneses chose not to sign. we have 23M on the cap this year. few contract redos next year and its easily over 65M. that's with Dak's large cap number.
the incompetence lies with the GM and nobody but the GM.