SportsGuru80
CowboysYanksLakers
- Messages
- 8,722
- Reaction score
- 4,566
See ya.... He wasn't really that good anyway.
The debate I remember from 2012 was whether Costa should get any credit for his performance against the eventual Super Bowl Champion Baltimore Ravens.
Reading in other sports, baseball has more patience in player development. One team's 26 year- old first round draft choice looks to be ready to move to the big leagues.
you are so wrong its sad. He did not beat out the incumbent; only the costa homers still cling to that. Why are you unwilling to admit you were wrong? The only reason Gurode was gone and Costa was staying was money. And anyone looking at how costa played thinking he had any business starting is insane. That was the first real evidence that Houck had lost it as a coach. He was not NFL starting quality. The fact that he did start for us is an indictment of everyone involved in that decision.
You should be paying closer attention to the facts of the matter, burm. You may not have liked it, but what happened is what happened.
you are truly blind if you do not think that the only reason that Costa was around was becasue Gurode was too expensive. But then as regards the O line you always have been blind.
you are so wrong its sad. He did not beat out the incumbent; only the costa homers still cling to that. Why are you unwilling to admit you were wrong? The only reason Gurode was gone and Costa was staying was money. And anyone looking at how costa played thinking he had any business starting is insane. That was the first real evidence that Houck had lost it as a coach. He was not NFL starting quality. The fact that he did start for us is an indictment of everyone involved in that decision.
I agree with you. I don't remember anyone at that time state that Costa was better than Gurode. In fact, I would wage a pretty penny that Gurode in fat and lazy mode, would beat out and healthy and fit Costa during that year.
Look at the previous post where the quote from Garrett was given.
And considering that Costa had more snaps at center during his abbreviated 2012 season than Gurode has had with two different teams since the start of the 2011 season speaks volumes about Gurode's ability to play center at an NFL level.
All of this may be true about Guorode, but it's still arguing which is better - gonorrhea or syphilis? Just because it was cheaper to catch syphilis from one party doesn't make it coveted.
As I said before, I'm not stating that Costa was that right choice, but it was plain that Gurode's career as an NFL center was over with during training camp 2011.
Blind, and exactly right as to what the team would do. The facts are the facts.
and costa never should have been starting.
I'm thinking now the Cowboys re-sign Ryan Cook. Not as young as Costa, but will only command a veteran minimum salary and offers more position flex (has played center, guard, and tackle during his career).
Cook is a horrific player. There's no need to resign him. Get yourself a C/G type in the draft and add another C in UDFA.
That's if you don't upgrade the starting G position in the draft and move Bernadeau to where he belongs.
Blind, and exactly right as to what the team would do. The facts are the facts.
Cook is a horrific player. There's no need to resign him. Get yourself a C/G type in the draft and add another C in UDFA.
That's if you don't upgrade the starting G position in the draft and move Bernadeau to where he belongs.