Cowboys among five teams reportedly interested in Pierre Garcon

Sydla

Well-Known Member
Messages
61,718
Reaction score
95,205
I'm trying to remember the last time Garçon did anything wrong f note against Dallas since we supposedly have such a bad secondary. 2012? lol meanwhile Ginn was a number 1 wr for a super bowl team. Let's talk facts here if we gonna talk

Ginn was a #1 WR but default that year. He's never sniffed 1000 yards or 70 receptions.

Holy hell, dude.
 

Sydla

Well-Known Member
Messages
61,718
Reaction score
95,205
I think Ted Ginn is a faster version of Terrance Williams. Wouldn't mind him either but garcon is definitely another saftey net for prescott. He's reliable. I'd be happy with either. Garcon has decent speed

Exactly. I wouldn't be opposed to Ginn at all. But Garçon is a better WR and it's not even debatable.
 

stilltheguru88

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,737
Reaction score
6,243
Ginn was a #1 WR but default that year. He's never sniffed 1000 yards or 70 receptions.

Holy hell, dude.
He sniffed 10 tds though (holy hell) yourself. I'm obsessed with having different dimensions, not two of the same damn receivers
 

Sydla

Well-Known Member
Messages
61,718
Reaction score
95,205
He sniffed 10 tds though (holy hell) yourself. I'm obsessed with having different dimensions not two of the same damn receivers

You can win without having a burner on the outside. There's your problem.

This is moot anyway because Garçon is going to get paid more than we probably want to spend.
 

Sydla

Well-Known Member
Messages
61,718
Reaction score
95,205
Better and better for Dallas are two different things.

No, not really. In fact, you can argue Garçon makes more sense. With this offense they are going to run the ball, control the clock and work the mid range passing game.

Garçon fits better than Ginn for that style of offense.
 

stilltheguru88

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,737
Reaction score
6,243
You can win without having a burner on the outside. There's your problem.

This is moot anyway because Garçon is going to get paid more than we probably want to spend.
You can. But for this team I think we need it.
 

stilltheguru88

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,737
Reaction score
6,243
No, not really. In fact, you can argue Garçon makes more sense. With this offense they are going to run the ball, control the clock and work the mid range passing game.

Garçon fits better than Ginn for that style of offense.
Carolina was a running team in Ginn 10 td season. Let's talk facts like I said
 

Sydla

Well-Known Member
Messages
61,718
Reaction score
95,205
Carolina was a running team in Ginn 10 td season. Let's talk facts like I said

He had 10 TDs once in his entire career. In an unconventional offense around Cam Newton.

He's not a #1 type WR.

He's barely a decent #2.

He's not as good as Garçon.

You don't need Ted Ginn for Dallas to win.

Again, I'll take Ginn. But if cost weren't an option there are like 4 or 5 FA WRs is want over him.

You overrate Ginn.
 

Sydla

Well-Known Member
Messages
61,718
Reaction score
95,205
And frankly, if I am looking for a cheap-ish free agent WR, I'd look at Michael Floyd first.
 

stilltheguru88

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,737
Reaction score
6,243
He had 10 TDs once in his entire career. In an unconventional offense around Cam Newton.

He's not a #1 type WR.

He's barely a decent #2.

He's not as good as Garçon.

You don't need Ted Ginn for Dallas to win.

Again, I'll take Ginn. But if cost weren't an option there are like 4 or 5 FA WRs is want over him.

You overrate Ginn.
We'll agree to disagree. I'd love to see teams double Dez with Ginn out there. :thumbup:
 

JoeKing

Diehard
Messages
36,638
Reaction score
31,938
The Commanders want to retain Garcon and he wants to be there. So unless the Rams, Eagles, Bears, Cowboys, or 49ers want to pay more for his services, it sounds to me like he isn't going anywhere. You can go ahead and scratch the Cowboys off that list because we aren't getting in that bidding war.
 
Top