BobbyFlame469
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 1,468
- Reaction score
- 1,903
This post is so wrong.Bruh, you really stretching for numbers. I mean you tried the 3-1 angle and a win after the loss to the Cowboys, now you are here. The Vikings averaged 20 points per game and the Bears 17. The Lions averaged 21. But they soundly beat that margin playing the awful Packers defense, who were allowing 400 plus yards.
It’s like me saying the Falcons put up 44 points against a Packers. The Falcons put up 24 in one half, holding the Packers to 0, until the third quarter. The Falcons defense was 27th in the league, way worse than Dallas. The Packers were 21.
So yeah, the Packers sucked and how come it was 28-13 going into the 4th against such a horrible defense? I mean the Packers only put up 6 in the fourth.
So why didn’t the FIFTH rank scoring offense at HOME put up more than that, instead of having to play major catch up in the fourth, against soft defense. And BTW, Dak threw an INT in the third from the GB 19 yard line, when Zeke was running like a mad dog, including a 22 yard run to initiate that drive.
you must be an Eagles or Romo fan.
Dak is the most talented quarterback we’ve had since Roger. He’s as accurate as Aikman with a MUCH better feel for the pocket than Romo. Plus teammates like him.
jerry Jones won