Hawkeye0202
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 25,810
- Reaction score
- 46,943
+1 ......Personally, I don't see Jerry having the patience for a young unproven assistant coach cuz of the big three contracts ( Dak, Lamb and soon Parsons). Keep in mind MM was a situational hire in that Jerry wanted a proven coach with post-season experience. I think we see the same type of hire again but this time someone can maximize Dak, Lamb, and Parsons's potential.Can you provide me a quick dialogue on how a convo between between Ben Johnson and Bill Belicheck would go if they were to have to sit down and explain their game plan to each other?
How would Ben Johnson be so much better of a hire compared to a guy with tons of knowledge?
Does it really just boil down to being young and maybe having a couple of good ideas here and there? Im sure every coach has had a few good ideas.
Is Ben Johnson's decision making on the fly better? How do you prove that? Does he make quicker adjustments?
I just dont get how all these FO's are just kicking Bill to the curb with all that knowledge? Maybe it is locker room chemistry and he doesnt relate to the players. I just dont see that as being a super big issue when you have a coach with tons of knowledge. Seems like knowledge would trump coach/player chemistry. I am a big fan of coaches being player coaches, though.
No one seems to have any solid answers as to why Big Bill should be sent off to the pasture. Posters are just saying "Go young" without any good reasons. Sure, you would prefer a coach that could be with you 10 years...but most coaches come and go within 3...so who cares about Bill's age?
I think if you were to sit down and play a football strategy game with each coach explaining every play....I think Bill would come across as the better manager compared with a young guy. As in...my money would be on Bill to have more ideas to counter a strategy than the young guy.
Young only matters if you want a coach for 10 years, you think players need young coaches they can relate to or if you think coaches need to be young so they can breathe fire at players discipline wise.
Everyone is saying 'young, innovative coaches'....but wouldnt older coaches who have been in the game for a while at the highest level and seen a lot....wouldnt the game be slowed down for them and they would have a more ideas since they have seen a lot?
It just doesnt make sense to me why so many are screaming 'go young' all the time.