Dalmations202
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 1,607
- Reaction score
- 1,117
I know you restructured Cooper, and I think that is the answer myself. I have a question for those who want to cut Coop and resign Gallup.
Is the WR group better with Gallup and without Coop than they were this year with both?
Is the team better with Gallup, CD, and a 1st round WR draft pick than if they had Cooper, CD, a descent #3 FA and the best TE in the draft ?
I just don't see any way in which Dallas can be better without Cooper. They might be just as good, but it will cost them draft capital and or FA money to get back to the level which they were currently at this last year. While I think Gallup and Wilson can be replaced fairly easily, I don't think Coop can be.
IMO, if you want the offense to get better -- you keep Coop (restructure yes), and get a much better TE that can catch and block -increasing both the running and passing games.
Next year you will need to be focusing on getting another RB.
Is the WR group better with Gallup and without Coop than they were this year with both?
Is the team better with Gallup, CD, and a 1st round WR draft pick than if they had Cooper, CD, a descent #3 FA and the best TE in the draft ?
I just don't see any way in which Dallas can be better without Cooper. They might be just as good, but it will cost them draft capital and or FA money to get back to the level which they were currently at this last year. While I think Gallup and Wilson can be replaced fairly easily, I don't think Coop can be.
IMO, if you want the offense to get better -- you keep Coop (restructure yes), and get a much better TE that can catch and block -increasing both the running and passing games.
Next year you will need to be focusing on getting another RB.