Verdict
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 26,099
- Reaction score
- 20,290
This is an 18 player draft.
Yeah. Thank goodness we won and ruined the chance to draft one of them. Where would we have drafted had we lost today?
This is an 18 player draft.
Nice to see that things are so positive here
Perfect! I'm sure there will be a guy at 19 who is a top 5 talent but w drop foot or drug issues.
A terrible idea. Recipe for disaster.We need quality over quantity .
I'm all for trading up as much as possible even if it means a smaller draft class.
Adding quality is never a recipe for disaster.A terrible idea. Recipe for disaster.
The quality over quantity mindset which makes teams trade up is the recipe for disaster.Adding quality is never a recipe for disaster.
Yeah. Thank goodness we won and ruined the chance to draft one of them. Where would we have drafted had we lost today?
Is that the smell of ... mediocrity?Set in stone...
Ah, good, I knew we were closer to the smell of mediocrity than 19.I believe #16.
Moving up increases your odds of getting quality. Late round picks have a greater chance of getting cut.The quality over quantity mindset which makes teams trade up is the recipe for disaster.
In the draft you want to come out with as many at bat's as possible to land that quality.
Where is the research to back this claim?Moving up increases your odds of getting quality. Late round picks have a greater chance of getting cut.
We need quality over quantity .
I'm all for trading up as much as possible even if it means a smaller draft class.
Idk... their decisions worry me sometimesMoving up increases your odds of getting quality. Late round picks have a greater chance of getting cut.
Where is the research to back this claim?
In fact most analysis of the draft say the opposite.... Moving up is a bad idea.
I'll look forward to your follow-up.
Idk... their decisions worry me sometimes