- Messages
- 58,971
- Reaction score
- 60,826
That just baffles me. It really does. I can't understand wanting someone better perhaps. But some here are going overboard - saying he can't be productive anymore and that he's too old.
I believe some Cowboys fans are so used to losing that they aren't comfortable with winning. They want to get back to what their used to which is losing. I guess when we lose its easier to come in here a grumble about it. Now when we win people can't gripe and grumble anymore thus they find anyways to nitpick the Cowboys.
Sorry to say these fellas but I think the Cowboys are back. So you better get used to winning. If you can't handle us winning then there are other teams to root for such as Cleveland and Tampa to name a few.
Is it just easier to believe something like that than it is to look at what historically happens to players under the level of workload we gave to Murray last season? None of this is to make light of Murray's contributions under his rookie contract. In fact, of most of the posters on this board, I was probably one of the guys defending the quality of Murray's play against some of the posters who now want to extend him for a second deal at what's going to have to be a premium to market rate. But this next deal is not about what Demarco Murray has done for us. It's only about what he's likely to do. If players in his circumstances usually drop off dramatically at his age and number of carries from the previous season, then you have to be smart and be prepared for that to happen with any contract extension you give him. If you can't price a deal accordingly, then you have to move on. Especially when it's a zero sum game and you're team is in desperate need of a pass rush. And especially when there are ~8-10 guys in the draft this season you can realistically plug into your hole at RB. Whereas the only realistic pass rush options are in VFA and are going to be expensive.
As for the Cowboys being back...yes, I know. I've been telling a hostile majority of posters that since Jason Garrett's been in charge. This time last season that loud group of 'realists' were calling me an idiot for saying I'd have extended him then. And I was saying the problem was not at HC and we needed to address the defense if we wanted to get over the hump. Now it's obvious I was right about the HC, but we still need to address the defense. If you overpay for a RB and extend Dez, that's going to be really hard to do with our current cap situation.