Twitter: Cowboys not pursuing Suh

Blackspider214

Well-Known Member
Messages
12,905
Reaction score
15,690
Suh will absolutely take more money elsewhere than we will offer. It's not even a question.

Then we should offer more than the highest bidder. Suh makes every single person on this DL better. He's great at stopping the run up the middle, something we lack.Go spend money to get a proven guy. Because our talent evaluation in the draft is putrid. Not like we can really count on that aspect.
 

Blackspider214

Well-Known Member
Messages
12,905
Reaction score
15,690
You apparently have never watched any Miami games.................Suh NEVER MAILED it in after getting paid.

He was rated the #2 interior defensive lineman in the NFL last season..................He is as legit as they come

Cowboy fans love talking themselves out of every single free agent to make themselves feel better when we never sign any impact players. Everyone is overrated and overpaid. Stick to bargain hunting!
 

Beast_from_East

Well-Known Member
Messages
29,982
Reaction score
27,060
Then we should offer more than the highest bidder. Suh makes every single person on this DL better. He's great at stopping the run up the middle, something we lack.Go spend money to get a proven guy. Because our talent evaluation in the draft is putrid. Not like we can really count on that aspect.

Exactly.............would somebody go tell these cheap *******s that good players cost money.

Shopping in the bargin bin at Wal Mart aint gonna win you chit...............I'm sorry, but that is the cold hard truth.

Open up the dam wallet, its getting embarrassing how cheap this organization has gotten.
 

USMarineVet

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,686
Reaction score
2,923
Head case. Dirty player. Would be a locker room liability and in the decline years of his career.

No thank you.
 

MRV52

rat2k8
Messages
8,770
Reaction score
9,827
Next man, Which guy is next on the list that the Cowboys say they are pursuing, and then say were are not interested. This team does it every year to its fans and brings in nothing but SCRUBS. Good luck Jerry this year as the Eagles will mop up again.
 

thisiscowboyscountry

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,375
Reaction score
1,136
Suhs contract was for over 20 million in Miami. Doubt he takes a big pay cut to single digits. Do you really want to pay a 31 year old player 12, 13, 14, even 15 million a year? Great player, but man that's a lot for a 1tech.
 

Blackspider214

Well-Known Member
Messages
12,905
Reaction score
15,690
Exactly.............would somebody go tell these cheap *******s that good players cost money.

Shopping in the bargin bin at Wal Mart aint gonna win you chit...............I'm sorry, but that is the cold hard truth.

Open up the dam wallet, its getting embarrassing how cheap this organization has gotten.

Yep. Eagles have proven that a very proactive front office can turn a team around. Chip got rid of all their talent and left them as a terrible team. Eagles got rid of Chip not long after he took them to the playoffs. They don't care about some "process". There is no process in football. The turnover is rapid every few years. Garrett should not get nearly a decade to figure out how to actually coach.

They win a Super Bowl, are $11m over the cap and still make moves. Why? Because there is no real such thing as salary cap hell. That's a term used to make excuses for their lack of production in the front office. If a team wants a player, they can get him. It's not hard to move money around. We used to do it all the time. Jerry used to go get players he wanted. Now they weren't always the right move but he rolled the dice. Stephen is the guy who shops at a thrift store and expects Neiman Marcus and Nordstrom's quality. We don't need to be reckless and dumb like Daniel Snyder but there is definitely a happy medium to find between Stephen's approach and Jerry's old approach.

If you spend money on the right players who impact your team greatly, then who cares what it cost. You are winning now. Every team aside from a very few usually have a 5 year window to work with. You can't try and build too long in the future in the NFL. It's too volatile of a sport.
 

Blackspider214

Well-Known Member
Messages
12,905
Reaction score
15,690
Suhs contract was for over 20 million in Miami. Doubt he takes a big pay cut to single digits. Do you really want to pay a 31 year old player 12, 13, 14, even 15 million a year? Great player, but man that's a lot for a 1tech.

Like clockwork. Everyone is overrated and overpaid. Yada yada yada.

Lets go instead get some spare who is close to being on the streets. That's a winning formula!
 

Beast_from_East

Well-Known Member
Messages
29,982
Reaction score
27,060
Yep. Eagles have proven that a very proactive front office can turn a team around. Chip got rid of all their talent and left them as a terrible team. Eagles got rid of Chip not long after he took them to the playoffs. They don't care about some "process". There is no process in football. The turnover is rapid every few years. Garrett should not get nearly a decade to figure out how to actually coach.

They win a Super Bowl, are $11m over the cap and still make moves. Why? Because there is no real such thing as salary cap hell. That's a term used to make excuses for their lack of production in the front office. If a team wants a player, they can get him. It's not hard to move money around. We used to do it all the time. Jerry used to go get players he wanted. Now they weren't always the right move but he rolled the dice. Stephen is the guy who shops at a thrift store and expects Neiman Marcus and Nordstrom's quality. We don't need to be reckless and dumb like Daniel Snyder but there is definitely a happy medium to find between Stephen's approach and Jerry's old approach.

If you spend money on the right players who impact your team greatly, then who cares what it cost. You are winning now. Every team aside from a very few usually have a 5 year window to work with. You can't try and build too long in the future in the NFL. It's too volatile of a sport.

Exactly....................good players cost money, a lot of money.

Shopping in the bargin bin for scrubs wins you jack because the players that sign for those low ball deals typically all suck. If they were good, they would get market value contracts for their positions.

You do get what you pay for in the NFL........good players make more than average players and great players make more than good players.

Now if you don't want to pay market, then don't complain about the quality of the player you get.
 

Blackspider214

Well-Known Member
Messages
12,905
Reaction score
15,690
Exactly....................good players cost money, a lot of money.

Shopping in the bargin bin for scrubs wins you jack because the players that sign for those low ball deals typically all suck. If they were good, they would get market value contracts for their positions.

You do get what you pay for in the NFL........good players make more than average players and great players make more than good players.

Now if you don't want to pay market, then don't complain about the quality of the player you get.

Yep. Salary cap is always on the rise. These contracts will continue to inflate. But all our fans always spit out the same narrative that all these players are overpaid and overrated and we should rather go cheap to save money. Saving money is fine if you actually have a vision with the money and will put it to good use. We don't. We continue down the same path, especially for defense. A unit that has been our achilles heel forever now. Why not start spending money there and get better? Bargain hunting scrubs aren't turning us around i.e. Nolan Carroll's of the world.
 

thisiscowboyscountry

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,375
Reaction score
1,136
Like clockwork. Everyone is overrated and overpaid. Yada yada yada.

Lets go instead get some spare who is close to being on the streets. That's a winning formula!

Yes let's go out and sign a 31 year old 1 tech for 4 years at 15 million a season. I never said he was overrated anywhere in my post, yada, yada, yada. I think everyone would love to have Suh, but there are other spots I rather spend money on. Honestly it may be possible to bring in Earl Thomas and Bowman for the same contract you would sign Suh for per season. We should atleast make a push for Suh but if we're up to 15 million a season I will pass.
 

kevm3

Well-Known Member
Messages
9,790
Reaction score
12,833
I'd rather pay Suh up to 14 million for a couple of years than 3 or 4 junk players who will be cut after preseason. I'll even give him maybe 17 million for a 1 year contract.
 

DandyDon52

Well-Known Member
Messages
22,298
Reaction score
16,181
Cowboys spend all their money on Lawrence free agency is pretty much over
 

SoBlue128

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,991
Reaction score
5,670
If only the Cowboys generated enough money to pay guys like Suh..



No worries the coaching staff will coach up the guys they like and we can clap our arses off to another mediocre season.
 

Beast_from_East

Well-Known Member
Messages
29,982
Reaction score
27,060

kittylaugh.jpg
 
Top