The chart shows results for the last 26 years.The top 3 are in the last 6 years. That makes the Cowboys 4th in the last 6 years.
In no way does that classify as anything resembling "historic."
It's also comparing 4 games to full seasons.
And? How does that contradict what I said? The chart also shows the years for each occurrence. Notice that the top 3 are since 2020. That means the Cowboys numbers (which again are 4 games, not a season like those others in the chart) are the 4th best in the last 7 years (my bad on 6 before, though we're only 4 games into the 7th).The chart shows results for the last 26 years.
The English language is not capable of making things any more clear than that.
Because they wanna believe the post. If they didn't, they would be picking it apart.Everybody out here butchering the meaning of "historic" and at the same time acting like English savants.
More narrowing of the criteria to confirm an agenda.Per drive. Read lol
LOL, this board is off the charts!Is English not your first language?
"What do 'pace' mean?!?"The top 3 are in the last 6 years. That makes the Cowboys 4th in the last 6 years.
In no way does that classify as anything resembling "historic."
It's also comparing 4 games to full seasons.

You humiliated yourself before by arguing against "per drive" stats.More narrowing of the criteria to confirm an agenda.
You seem to hang your hat on "per drive" stats for some reason. As if regular stat-keeping by EVERYONE ELSE..is nonsense.

Even 6 would be crazy good. We're talking about 32 teams X 6 years and we're 4th. So top 4 out of 192 just doesn't impress some people lol.I think it’s saying last 20 years not last 6.
Yes you are correct.Was this thread started just to bash the D or did it get sidetracked from the very first post?
4th in the last 20 years is elite company. And it’s only been 4 games but I think that’s why it said “on pace”The top 3 are in the last 6 years. That makes the Cowboys 4th in the last 6 years.
In no way does that classify as anything resembling "historic."
It's also comparing 4 games to full seasons.
I agree.Even 6 would be crazy good. We're talking about 32 teams X 6 years and we're 4th. So top 4 out of 192 just doesn't impress some people lol.
If you say so.You humiliated yourself before by arguing against "per drive" stats.
![]()
Will we ever have a great defense to pair with this O?
Or a good defense?
Or an adequate defense?

Do you know what historic means?"What do 'pace' mean?!?"
And LOL at the notion that it doesn't count as "historic" if other similarly historic seasons happened recently.
![]()
Who argued it wasn't good or impressive?4th in the last 20 years is elite company. And it’s only been 4 games but I think that’s why it said “on pace”
You probably don’t want to be on the internet or social media though lol.Who argued it wasn't good or impressive?
We're talking about the word "historic". People here throw it around flippantly about everything.
Doesn't matter if it's something that has happened many times before. As long as it's near one extreme or the other, it suddenly becomes "historic."
I miss when words had actual meaning.
Will we ever have a great defense to pair with this O?
Or a good defense?
Or an adequate defense?
