Say only the haters who have proved over and over again they are clueless about NFL football.Or just let this guy walk because he's not Mahomes, Watson, Rodgers, or Wilson. No reason to pay this guy. Let some other team waste cap space and get nowhere. We're not winning anything with this QB at that pay level.
Again this is just for consumption. I want Dak back but my question is the price. Plus it adds some Amari convo
Who want admit it? Speak for yourself. The thing is Dak isn't worth holding out but since I don't run the Cowboys he can. If I did he'd be a free agent whenever that happens because for his actual skill level its not hard to replace like some here think.Hold out and get what you can! We all would, just most won't admit it.
You say that now because you're nowhere near this type of salary. In whatever job you work now would you take less than what is the going rate and if so how much less? I think regular people need to stop comparing their money to money the majority of us aren't seeing.No offense but you don't speak for me. I would be perfectly happy with $33M per year.
Yeah but Goff and Wentz have at least gotten to the SB. Daks led this team no farther than a wild card winNO ITS NOT GOOD ENOUGH. Goff and wentz are getting $34m a year and made almost $15m more just from their initial 1st round contracts compared to what dak has been paid. Dak's numbers are better than Wentz's and Goff's. Why should he take less money? It's not Dak's fault this team had terrible contracts in Romo and Dez that they had to eat so they couldn't sign any big free agents to make the team better on his rookie cheap labor deal.
actually the first deals were 30 and minor changes and small increases, he was offered 32 last year and 33 with 90 then 100 and now 105 guarantees..so nothing earth shattering on changes but they are changes none the less..IDC what dak thinks he should do this is afar offer for a QB that hasn't eared his skins yet and failed to get his team over the hump last year and Dak was an issue down the stretch, lest stop dumping this on garett and other players..some of those games Dak lost because he fell apart when it truly counted,, Hollow padded numbers should not get you a market deal..33 with 105 in guarantees no matter the length, should be enough for dak to play with insurance and set for life comfortably...Wasn't the story that they offered him 33 last year?
Goff and Wentz got more in guarantees, Goff got more in salary.
Dak should wait until free agency shakes out. Jerry has shown a lack of will to even *consider* signing someone else. Jerry needs the tag for Cooper. Dak has every reason to wait, instead of signing money he could have had last year. It's not a serious offer to get Dak to move.
I think the floor on Dak's contract is 35mil.
I know what happened that’s why I brought it up. Obviously Bradshaw won the super bowls from having a better team. That’s exactly what I said. Just like Goff won because he had the better team, not because he was the better QB. Same for Dilfer.
I brought those examples up for the exact reasons you’re now giving me some kind of dumb history lesson about and actually reinforcing what I was saying, which is that better teams win. And it’s not always indicate of who the better QB is.
so again, Dak was the better QB in the playoffs than Goff. But Goff’s team won because it was better. Just like Dilfer and Bradshaw won because they were on better teams. Thanks for reinforcing that point for me.
I do care who wins. We are talking strictly about a players contractual value. Not about caring during season who wins or loses. Apparently your brain can’t separate the two.
we will tank the season without him. The going rate for a decent QB is what it is and will only get worse under the new CBA. I hate the money these guys are getting, but that's the market. Tanking the year, with new coaches/staff doesn't make much sense. We are in win now mode...not 5 years from now. We have 35 million reasons TO pay him.
I would be perfectly happy with $33M in my lifetime.No offense but you don't speak for me. I would be perfectly happy with $33M per year.
Wentz has played 8 minutes in the playoffs and has 0 wins in the playoffs and superbowl. Wentz hasn't gotten to a superbowl, you don't get the credit when sitting on the bench the entire playoffs and superbowl.Yeah but Goff and Wentz have at least gotten to the SB. Daks led this team no farther than a wild card win
Goff didn’t have the steel curtain defense or the 2000 Ravens defense. His 2018 Rams team wasn’t nearly as good as those teams. His game came down some that season because the Rams offense lost their best receiver Cooper Kupp. I felt the Cowboys had a good chance to beat the Rams in that playoff game had their defense been playing like it did when we they faced the Saints. A QBs W/L record especially in the playoffs plays a part in contract negotiations. QBs are given a W/L record because they have a big influence on the outcome of games. We’ve argued this long enough and we don’t agree. If you want to keep wasting time go ahead.
None of that means the Rams weren’t a better team than the cowboys though.
how about 30?? dont be greedy!No offense but you don't speak for me. I would be perfectly happy with $33M per year.
Yes you do get credit, I can assure you his Super Bowl ring is quite real. Maybe you can go buy a toy ring for Dak and you can go wear it and watch the Super Bowl on TV, troll.Wentz has played 8 minutes in the playoffs and has 0 wins in the playoffs and superbowl. Wentz hasn't gotten to a superbowl, you don't get the credit when sitting on the bench the entire playoffs and superbowl.
Again this is just for consumption. I want Dak back but my question is the price. Plus it adds some Amari convo