Cowboys open to bringing back Josh Brent

[RS12]

 

[WPBCowboysFan]

After last years DL fiasco, no surprise here.

 

[EST_1986]

I wouldn't be against it. He's paid the price for his mistake twice over.

 

[JoeyBoy718]

Just wish we'd be consistent with this whole RKG thing. We passed on some good players because of character concerns. Imagine if we had Vontaze Burflict and Janoris Jenkins (and an extra 1st round pick since we would have passed on Claiborne).

 

[Chocolate Lab]

Who didn't see this coming.

RKGs, y'all.

 

[khiladi]

Who didn't see this coming.

RKGs, ya'll.

Beat me to the punch....

 

[Dwight]

Does not make any sense. That means (which we already knew) they have concerns about the dline.

If management would have planned better years ago this team would not entertain Josh Brent.

 

[JoeyBoy718]

The people who preach philosophies are the people who break them. If someone is an advocate for fidelity, they're having an affair.

 

[Zordon]

Does not make any sense. That means (which we already knew) they have concerns about the dline.

If management would have planned better years ago this team would not entertain Josh Brent.

desperate times call for desperate measures...

 

[cowboyschmps3]

I wouldn't mind at all certainly can come in and compete as a 1 tech, easily would be the biggest lineman at 320 somewhere there.

 

[CashMan]

desperate times call for desperate measures...

If he was racking up 10-15 sacks a year, I would agree, he is a JAG.

 

[Craig]

I am interested in it just to follow the backlash.

 

[Setackin]

LOL. I am sure if it was your relative he killed during his 2nd DUI incident and he gets a measly 180 days you would think he paid for it twice over. Joke.

Dudes mom wanted brent to do no jail time.

 

[Idgit]

Two things that have been completely obvious for a long time now: The Cowboys would welcome Brent back, and people will misunderstand what RKG means for, what, the thousandth time. Seriously, guys, it's not even believable that you don't know what that term means by now.

 

[LatinMind]

Does not make any sense. That means (which we already knew) they have concerns about the dline.

If management would have planned better years ago this team would not entertain Josh Brent.

Or they see a good young cheap player to add to the mix of young players they already have?

I dont understand why everything the Cowboys do has to have "fans" look at it negatively. And then these fans have the nerve to bash media for being negative on the team. IMO most media have nothing on these types of fans on negativity.

 

[WPBCowboysFan]

The people who preach philosophies are the people who break them. If someone is an advocate for fidelity, they're having an affair.

Oh yea, right. Thats as ignorant of a statement as has been made on here in a long time.

 

[Dwight]

Or they see a good young cheap player to add to the mix of young players they already have?

I dont understand why everything the Cowboys do has to have "fans" look at it negatively. And then these fans have the nerve to bash media for being negative on the team. IMO most media have nothing on these types of fans on negativity.

I never said everything the Cowboys do is negative. You're stating something that's not there. I actually liked what they did this past offseason with the exception of a couple of things.

Their record speaks for itself the past four years.

I just do not believe they should pursue Brent. That's all.

 

[LatinMind]

I never said everything the Cowboys do is negative. You're stating something that's not there. I actually liked what they did this past offseason with the exception of a couple of things.

I just do not believe they should pursue Brent. That's all.

why not?

 

[BAZ]

I don't get the fuss over his ability, he's a 7th rounder, out a football for a year with one career sack.

 

[DBOY3141]

Goodell will suspend him for the entire 2014 season, so it's not going to matter.