Cowboys plan to sign will Allen instead of Huff

Denim Chicken

Well-Known Member
Messages
15,683
Reaction score
24,569
TheRomoSexual;5033281 said:
Kenny V. would immediately solidify our defensive backfield.

We know about a much about Kenny V. in the NFL as we do about Matt J.
 

TheRomoSexual

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,057
Reaction score
4,958
Denim Chicken;5033283 said:
We know about a much about Kenny V. in the NFL as we do about Matt J.

You could say that about any prospect, so that's an absurd comment when discussing how we think a draft pick will impact a team.
 

Denim Chicken

Well-Known Member
Messages
15,683
Reaction score
24,569
TheRomoSexual;5033284 said:
You could say that about any prospect, so that's an absurd comment when discussing how we think a draft pick will impact a team.

I suppose you could say the same thing about saying a rookie will 'solidify our backfield".
 

Doomsday101

Well-Known Member
Messages
107,762
Reaction score
39,034
dargonking999;5033276 said:
Well Safety is not our biggest need. when i watch the 2012 Dallas cowboys i see an OL that failed to protect Romo consistently, failed to run block for anything more than a 2 yard gain...I also saw a DL that got zero push, couldn't collaspe a pocket, and got zero pressure on the QB.

Safety is not the greatest need. The greatest need is line play. Safety is a flash pick, sexy pick that makes everyone think championship, but it will only get us 8-8 and wanting to fire a very good coach.

I would say OL,DL and Safety if I can get a top player at any of those position in rd 1 I would be happy. I don't turn my nose up at getting a quality player. I hope we can address all 3 with the BPA within the 1st 3 to 4 rds of the draft.
 

Denim Chicken

Well-Known Member
Messages
15,683
Reaction score
24,569
TheRomoSexual;5033296 said:
Um, not when I clarify that a statement is just my opinion (as I did). Under your ridiculous philosophy, message boards should not exist because, well, I guess in your world people shouldn't have opinions about uncertain topics (even though uncertainty is the only reason opinions even exist).

Drivel, but we're digressing.

We have Church, who looked good before injury. We have Johnson who coaches are high on. We now have Allen, who is serviceable back-up, as well as McCray. We have $50M Carr and #1 & 2 of last years picks in Clay and Scandrick, who has a sizable contract.

All this invested in the backfield and we want to give up our #1 this year as well?
 

Zimmy Lives

Well-Known Member
Messages
9,165
Reaction score
4,631
dargonking999;5033276 said:
Well Safety is not our biggest need. when i watch the 2012 Dallas cowboys i see an OL that failed to protect Romo consistently, failed to run block for anything more than a 2 yard gain...I also saw a DL that got zero push, couldn't collaspe a pocket, and got zero pressure on the QB.

Safety is not the greatest need. The greatest need is line play. Safety is a flash pick, sexy pick that makes everyone think championship, but it will only get us 8-8 and wanting to fire a very good coach.

This. Dallas needs meat on either line. Safety would just be gravy.
 

Doomsday101

Well-Known Member
Messages
107,762
Reaction score
39,034
Zimmy Lives;5033312 said:
This. Dallas needs meat on either line. Safety would just be gravy.

and if the gravy is great then it is good. Dallas needs quality players more than anything yes DL and OL need to be addressed and so does safety the defense stunk last season and while we do have church he is coming off an injury and we have Johnson which also injured and has not seen any time so there is some uncertainty. I'm all for getting OL but if they do not get that in the 1st rd that does not mean it can't be addressed within the 1st 3 rd of the draft. Funny we all talk about the great OL of the 90s yet not a single 1st rd pick out of the bunch. Step was a 3rd rd pick, Allen a 2nd, Eric Williams a 3rd and Tuinie and Newton undrafted hell Newton was cut from the Commanders his rookie year after not getting drafted.


I'm all for OL or DL in rd 1 but I would have no issue getting a top safety either.
 

dargonking999

DKRandom
Messages
12,578
Reaction score
2,057
TheRomoSexual;5033281 said:
Define what you mean by "need." At least we have the bodies to fill out a two-deep at the line. Besides, fixing the line won't be accomplished by picking a first round guard, whereas Kenny V. would immediately solidify our defensive backfield.




masking an opinion as fact does not make it true. Having bodies to fill out a line, and having players that can actually play at an above average level or two entirely different things.
 

Teague31

Defender of the Star
Messages
18,221
Reaction score
22,842
If signed as depth it's fine, if signed as a starter it's a disaster.
 

RoyTheHammer

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,801
Reaction score
1,850
Sweet! A guy who hasn't had an interception since the middle of last decade and who's averaged a fraction of a pass breakup per year since then.

He'll fit right in..
 

Kristen82

Active Member
Messages
965
Reaction score
221
RoyTheHammer;5033374 said:
Sweet! A guy who hasn't had an interception since the middle of last decade and who's averaged a fraction of a pass breakup per year since then.

He'll fit right in..

Well he is a SS, and they generally don't make as many plays as FS's do just because of the difference in their responsibilities.
 

RoyTheHammer

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,801
Reaction score
1,850
Kristen82;5033467 said:
Well he is a SS, and they generally don't make as many plays as FS's do just because of the difference in their responsibilities.

Safeties in this NFL are interchangable. The difference between SS and FS is minimal anymore, and plus, its not like he does much else either. He's averaged like 20 total tackles PER YEAR since 2006 and has yet to record a sack in his professional career.

Any one of these stats in an of itself? Not a huge deal.

Put together.. you have one pretty marginal player. If he starts for us, get worried.

PS.. nice vette. : )
 

Kristen82

Active Member
Messages
965
Reaction score
221
RoyTheHammer;5033494 said:
Safeties in this NFL are interchangable. The difference between SS and FS is minimal anymore, and plus, its not like he does much else either. He's averaged like 20 total tackles PER YEAR since 2006 and has yet to record a sack in his professional career.

Any one of these stats in an of itself? Not a huge deal.

Put together.. you have one pretty marginal player. If he starts for us, get worried.

PS.. nice vette. : )

I'm just assuming Allen is a SS because he doesn't have the typical range of a FS.

And merci. It's smiling because you complimented it :).
 

Risen Star

Likes Collector
Messages
89,471
Reaction score
212,430
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
I'm not looking at needs, though the OL is certainly a bigger need than S. I'm talking about best player available at 18. That won't be Vaccaro for me.
 

SilverStarCowboy

The Actualist
Messages
10,337
Reaction score
1,998
Risen Star;5033837 said:
I'm not looking at needs, though the OL is certainly a bigger need than S. I'm talking about best player available at 18. That won't be Vaccaro for me.



Well I certainly agree, Vaccaro was routinely burned in Man to Man coverage in College, sucked at zone and was replaced in some key situations for UT.

Though he kind of reminds me of Patrick Chung, pass @ 18.
 

CowboyMcCoy

Business is a Boomin
Messages
12,749
Reaction score
235
RoyTheHammer;5033494 said:
Safeties in this NFL are interchangable. The difference between SS and FS is minimal anymore, and plus, its not like he does much else either. He's averaged like 20 total tackles PER YEAR since 2006 and has yet to record a sack in his professional career.

Any one of these stats in an of itself? Not a huge deal.

Put together.. you have one pretty marginal player. If he starts for us, get worried.

PS.. nice vette. : )

Exactly. We missed the boat on Huff big time.
 

CowboyMcCoy

Business is a Boomin
Messages
12,749
Reaction score
235
SilverStarCowboy;5034284 said:
Well I certainly agree, Vaccaro was routinely burned in Man to Man coverage in College, sucked at zone and was replaced in some key situations for UT.

Though he kind of reminds me of Patrick Chung, pass @ 18.

Vaccoro is good. He'll just need a bit of time to adjust to the NFL. Huff was better coming out of college though.
 
Top