You don't seem to realize that they didn't want him on the team.
No. I knew Coop was gone based on JJ’s comments when he missed the KC and LVR games last year.
What you don’t seem to understand is that the goal of the GM is to build the best roster possible. Trading Coop bc they let their emotions drive the decision hurt the team overall.
We are clearly not better without Coop. And we very likely don’t have the #1 seed because of it.
Lots of other decisions— besides trading Coop for a bag of peanuts— COULD have been made but weren’t:
1. Work it out and resolve the internal issues.
2. Let him play out his contract and part ways once you back fill his position
3. Don’t telegraph your intentions to move on from him, so you actually get market value for him
4. Sign a viable FA replacement to help offset his production loss, not a C tier bargain bin FA like James Washington
5. Draft a quality WR not a small school development guy like Tolbert
Any of those options would have been more acceptable than what they decided to do: Publicly declare their intentions to move on from Coop so get destroyed in the trade, fail to draft or sign an adequate replacement player, and arrogantly act like everything is fine.
I honestly can’t believe you are trying to defend this position on the day when they unceremoniously dump the player that was touted as part of the “Coop replacement plan” along with Jaylon Tolbert lol…