KingintheNorth
Chris in Arizona
- Messages
- 18,475
- Reaction score
- 25,903
When did we get a capable safety?It's "significant" to me that they've only got three capable safeties.
When did we get a capable safety?It's "significant" to me that they've only got three capable safeties.
It's "significant" to me that they've only got three capable safeties.
It's also "significant" that they likely don't even have eight offensive linemen that can play.
It's "significant" to me that they rather use the space for a 20th receiver instead of where I see bigger needs.
A difference of opinion from yours I guess.
Whether they have enough safeties or not has nothing to do with this pick up, and has no bearing on whether they bring in another safety. Same for O-Line. This is a pick up of a player that no other team had signed and that had no history of even making an active roster, and is just intended to fill a spot in camp so they can run practices the way they want. Do you really think a player in that situation would be a big upgrade over what we already have in camp at safety or O-Line?
Whether they have enough safeties or not has nothing to do with this pick up, and has no bearing on whether they bring in another safety. Same for O-Line. This is a pick up of a player that no other team had signed and that had no history of even making an active roster, and is just intended to fill a spot in camp so they can run practices the way they want.
Do you really think a player in that situation would be a big upgrade over what we already have in camp at safety or O-Line?
If their response to stock up in anticipation of a trade was signing this journeyman, they are doing it wrong.Perhaps we are looking to trade a guy. Reports were Beasley was being shopped around. Not sure trade value wise if we get much though.
Our WR coach must have a lot of say we keep grinding through these WR FAs
Yes, you won a "wondering" Jerry picture.
How can anyone not like them bringing in another player during camp for a look see?So you think the suggestion to bring in more safety depth versus another WR with almost no chance to make the team is proof that his opinion is not valid?
You know you can support the team without defending every move they make?
I think this was for 2nd place! I already got that fantastic trophy!
It's post like this that make life worth living.Here's your trophy.......
for most annoying post of the day.....
we need time to find out. So far the bar isnt that high, so if a player wants to give it a go and have a fair shot id rather bring them in now. DO you disagree with giving a player time?
It's one of 90 roster spaces used for receiver #20, rather than safety #4 or offensive linemen #9. This is a time for evaluation as well as simply "filling a spot". They're paper thin at safety and offensive line. And yet they're signing yet more wide receivers. I don't agree with the move.
I think a player at safety has a better chance to contribute than no player does. And the same goes for offensive line.
How many more WR's are we going to get? What about Safety? Or even a better backup to DAK at QB.
Yes, you won a "wondering" Jerry picture.