lol, yea, that's like waving a white flag already.............whoever he was.I just hope we don't end up regretting that Saint Fleur release.
lol, yea, that's like waving a white flag already.............whoever he was.
Our QB to WR ratio, by my calculations, means we need to sign 64 more quarterbacks just to be able to play catch with each of them individually.
I believe they have 7 safeties in camp. The odds of finding someone notably better sitting at home that nobody previously even invited to training camp is very close to zero.
The receiver may have just been signed to provide bodies to run patterns in passing drills. It takes a number of receivers to work on passing drills with 3 QBs. So, again, the point of this kind of signing is just meeting the need for bodies to work on things in training camp. There is no expectation of finding a meaningful player.
No, it's not.
I think they should use the spots more effectively, and with the intention of finding a meaningful player. As I said, there are openings at safety and O-line.
Winner-winnerChampionship!
Did I win?!?
Answer this then ... why would players that have a very real shot at being meaningful players, and notably better players than those already in camp, be sitting at home, unsigned by any of the 32 NFL teams? Further, when was the last time you saw a guy become a meaningful player who was not even invited to a training camp until just before the 2nd preseason games were to be played? Have you ever?
The reality is this is just churning the bottom of the 90 man roster - a guy like this is no where in the ballpark of the 53, or even the practice squad for that matter. And this isn't just a Cowboy thing. This is the way it is for every team.
You tell me. Why is former #2 overall pick Luke Joeckel "not in a training camp"?
Why is Jonathan Hankins not on a roster?
"The reality is" that there are plenty of reason why about players. And plenty of better uses of roster spots than stocking up on receiver #20. Especially when the cupboard's bare at safety and offensive line.
If you disagree, that's fine, disagree. But don't make sweeping generalizations about the "reality" of anything.
Can never have too many crappy receivers, right? Right?
Answer this then ... why would players that have a very real shot at being meaningful players, and notably better players than those already in camp, be sitting at home, unsigned by any of the 32 NFL teams? Further, when was the last time you saw a guy become a meaningful player who was not even invited to a training camp until just before the 2nd preseason games were to be played? Have you ever?
The reality is this is just churning the bottom of the 90 man roster - a guy like this is no where in the ballpark of the 53, or even the practice squad for that matter. And this isn't just a Cowboy thing. This is the way it is for every team.
Can never have too many receivers, right? Right?
I think a player like Dez could beat out a few WRs on teams . Just because they been through TC doesnt mean they have more talent than some players. PLayers shift and some work better on different teams. The Combine is not an exact science. Nor is our drafting.
second Utah WR in the last few days.
As someone mentioned, he is the son of former Rams WR Flipper Anderson.
Our WR coach must have a lot of say we keep grinding through these WR FAs
If you are talking about the 1985 divisional playoff game, you must be misremembering something.He helped beat a good Dallas team in the playoffs long ago.
They go through a lot of WR and DB in camp, since they get a lot of work. Especially this year when they're intentionally working the deep ball a lot. They used to carry extra TEs to keep Witten from getting too much work before the season with all the TE sets they like to run. Sometimes they go deep at positions for practical purposes for getting camp to run the way they want to run it for the 57 or so players who actually have a shot at the active roster.