Silver N Blue
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 8,342
- Reaction score
- 8,982
My "thought pattern" has never changed. You came in saying that I didn't want to sign a 30 year old RB, you then provided "proof", but that "proof" said that I'd rather sign a rookie over a 30 year old RB. Are you going to provide a quote to me saying I wouldn't sign Peterson to a reasonable, cheap contract? If not, drop it, because you have nothing.
As for your "30 year old players don't decline rapidly", uh, yes they do. You can pull out exceptions, but 30 year old players DO decline rapidly. Pulling two or three examples from the past doesn't make it the norm, "poor fella".
And what do you want me to say about Gurley? I had a prediction that he'd slip in the draft, EVERYONE makes predictions. It happens. It's the draft, a crapshoot, me being "wrong" about it means very little. I care about me being wrong about us not grabbing an RB in the draft far more than Gurley going early, which I'm happy about.
Then you bring up the CB thing. I said with having Carr, Scandrick, and Claiborne I didn't feel we needed to draft a CB at 27. That's called opinion, not stating a fact.
It's alright to be wrong man. You said a 30 yr RB isn't worth the risk to bring in not me. Now you want one. All your predictions have been wrong it's ok.