Cydios
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 8,105
- Reaction score
- 7,193
I trully don't. It's just utter disapointment period. Maybe not the Swift one though.Wanting someone hurt isn't cool.
I trully don't. It's just utter disapointment period. Maybe not the Swift one though.Wanting someone hurt isn't cool.
I think monkeys are reserved for historically good quarterbacks who can’t get over the hump. Dak isn’t historically good. Not even close.True! I'm just saying that Manning had the monkey on his back until he did. Dak will have the monkey on his back until he does. That's where the comparisons end.
1. SfNot sure this is a playoff team. Smoked by the one team with a pulse and already had ***-kicked by crappy team who schemed against them. I don’t see them having much success against teams that are actually decent. This offense has been a joke through first 5 weeks and defensively it can be schemed against too easily. Defense too reliant on pass rush.
Pollard never was RB 1 and the line is old and garbageALSO: 34yds rushing.
Sorry but either the OLine completely sucks or Pollard isn't as good a RB1 as DAL thought he'd be.
Also...DAL has a FB and TEs but just have nowhere near the play calling creativity or ability to execute as SF
They need to burn it down…..Clearly a wide gulf between the "haves" (SF & PHI) and the "have-nots" (DAL & everyone else) in the NFC. 10-7 will be really lucky...with two "Ls" likely against Philly, and having to play BUF & MIA on the road.
I'm not opposed to burning the house down & rebuilding entirely. The irrational attachment to Dak as the face of the franchise has done nothing but hold the franchise back.
Me.35-10, San Francisco.
Who would have think it?
He won't be, that's gonna be his stance. He'd rather they release him so he can choose his destinationBut if Dak is willing ...