Deep_South
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 7,030
- Reaction score
- 3,653
Eagles down 7-0 already.

Mo has been very good and Byron looks like a potential star down the road. Problem is everyone else is bad to terrible.
The player cost us points and directly provided points to the opposing team. That being said, he isn't solely to blame. He did get the ball going downfield a few times more than his predecessor.
whether you want to agree with that or not, we already have the info we need. Ours WRs arent known for good separation. So we have to take that into account. Our QB cant throw long, so take that into account. Our running game was doing ok but we didnt have good moderate throws to give it help. We had good throws but ill give him 1 interception but after that you have to limit him. We tried it again and got burned. Thats being stupid.
Cassell went deep more times in one pass then Weeden has all year. Unfortunately that pass was picked off
Also, despite 3 INTs, I have no regrets about switching to Cassel. He did things I know Weeden wouldn't do. Just gotta cut out the back-breaking turnovers next week.
I would take today's power running game with check downs and deep play action all day. We win by two scores imo. Boring to you but very effective and safe with good defensive play.
Dan Turner @dtsturner 12m12 minutes ago
Blame Weeden / Cassel if you like, but hard to win when your team hasn't forced turnover in 4 gms. Too many big $ defenders not making plays
Dan Turner @dtsturner 12m12 minutes ago
Blame Weeden / Cassel if you like, but hard to win when your team hasn't forced turnover in 4 gms. Too many big $ defenders not making plays
Hilarious, since back breaking turnovers are also what Weeden wouldn't do.
I'm having a hard time following your logic. We spent the last three weeks not throwing into those coverages because we didn't trust the QB and because the WRs can't get separation. In the background, the coaches were preparing the more experienced QB they traded for in case they needed somebody better able to make those reads and execute those plays. Then they play him, and he throws into double coverage or his WRs don't get the separate or don't come back for the ball aggressively enough, and that's on the coaches, too?
At what point is it just the case that we don't have QBs good enough to win with if the rest of the team doesn't play better around them? Because I feel like I've been saying that for four weeks now (well, three, because I didn't really think we'd beat NE no matter what we did unless something exceptional happened). Instead, we get what we got today: -3 turnover differential on offense. No takeaways. A defensive score against us. A ST score against us. And a ST turn over to seal the loss. And people still want to blame the play calling. I just don't get it.
i dont want to go shocking you, but other teams can do it , check around.
We CRUSHED the Giants!!!
Time of possession (38:04 to 21:56), total yards (460 to 289) and first downs (27-13).
Oops, scoreboard doesn't reflect that
Eagles down 7-0 already.![]()
Even when Romo was healthy the beginning of the year, this team has played sloppy/bad football all season long. The 2015 version of your Dallas Cowboys finds ways to lose.