Dave_in-NC
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 17,049
- Reaction score
- 5,132
LOL. Garrett shouldn't be a HC but Chan Gailey? I never had a problem with him.
It's going to be a looooooong offseason.
Garrets the better coach? What proof?
LOL. Garrett shouldn't be a HC but Chan Gailey? I never had a problem with him.
It's going to be a looooooong offseason.
Just because Jerry is the cause of the Cowboys problems doesn't mean we should have to put up with a mediocre coach even though Jerry will just pick another mediocre one to replace him.
Garrets the better coach? What proof?
Firing Garrett does absolutely nothing to improve this team if that's the highest the changes go and most of these guys are too clueless to know it.
But they'll eventually get their wish, celebrate with some team colored fingerpainting, get excited for the next season, slowly begin to sour on his replacement and then reform the lynch mob.
If the head coach in Dallas, no matter who it is, is set up to fail, I will not judge that coach for failing. I will instead focus on why they are dealt that hand.
If the head coach in Dallas, no matter who it is, is set up to fail, I will not judge that coach for failing. I will instead focus on why they are dealt that hand.
Just because Jerry is the cause of the Cowboys problems doesn't mean we should have to put up with a mediocre coach even though Jerry will just pick another mediocre one to replace him.
On the proof that Garrett's advanced further than Gailey ever did.
Granted it was with the dynasty like 2014 roster but still.
Unless he's smartens up (not likely) and brings in Payton.
What has Garrett asked for and not received? Jerry's a tool, no argument but where has he held Garrett back? I would like to change my mind about him but I see no reason to.
Funny how Garrett had no problems firing Ryan and Jerry had no problems having Brian Stewart fired, but has s problem with firing Garrett.
He's the only consistent thing in this organization..
Linehan is here because of Garrett.. Callahan is gone because of Garrett. Dan Reeves was not here because of Garrett, not a time reporting issue.
It's alarming that you follow this team on a daily basis to this degree and don't know the answers to your questions.
Firing Garrett does absolutely nothing to improve this team if that's the highest the changes go and most of these guys are too clueless to know it.
But they'll eventually get their wish, celebrate with some team colored fingerpainting, get excited for the next season, slowly begin to sour on his replacement and then reform the lynch mob.
I would love that to happen.
I bet you said the same thing when we fired Campo and hired Parcells.
Of course your just running your mouth as usual. Never blamed Parcells for any thing. Wish he was here two more years minimum. No problem with Gailey either. If you had no problem with Switzer you have no clue. Campo is in the same category as Garrett to me. Never should have been a HC.
I know where the cancer starts. That doesn't mean the coach can't plan a game better.
The answer I figured I'd get.
Garrett's the only constant thing in the organization. If you're keeping score at home.
I can't think of anything else. It's Garrett.