Red Dragon
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 6,395
- Reaction score
- 3,773
Cowboys will basically be the 2000-2010 Phoenix Suns. Good but never good enough.
isn't year ten, the year Garrett blossoms into Landry?
Give him the captain obvious trophy.
It's 23 years. It's already played out. We're just continuing the mediocrity.Well, I guess I don't have to watch football now for a decade. Colin Cowherd has spoken.
Sorry, but with all due respect, let this thing play out. Two years ago Cowherd was so effusive with Dak Prescott praise he was literally putting him into the Hall of Fame. Now he's simply "good".
The thing is a lot of simply "good" QB's have won Super Bowls (Eli Manning, Joe Flacco, Trent Dilfer. Brad Johnson, etc.), so my hopes aren't dashed yet.
isn't year ten, the year Garrett blossoms into Landry?
Can we get paid too bro. Cash moneyOnly difference between him and us, is he gets paid.
Yeah he does. I like it though. Stir it up babyYou just love stirring the pot!!
We need to score more points in the first three quarters and not wait for the last 6 minutes to try to come back.You do know that he had possessions in the other 3 quarters too, right? Not blaming him entirely for the loss but he had a hand in it.
Why does anyone even listen to garbage like this? These type analysis are just to gain viewers and air time. Like paid trolls.Ah Yes... Keep moving the bar for clicks...3 weeks ago he stated Dak needed help to win...
Goff needs McVay to read defenses lol..(I was wondering why Goff was staring into the sky...listening to McVay
Is the assumption that Superbowl teams are special year in and out?
Nope..truth is all teams that make it to playoffs are good only one gets to be special.
Herd should just say Garrett and Dak will never win a Superbowl together..that is a bold opinion/prediction...I guess
Yep. That’s a recipe for disaster.We need to score more points in the first three quarters and not wait for the last 6 minutes to try to come back.
1 of 10 on third downs.
Right... a highly paid troll with a platform.Only difference between him and us, is he gets paid.
He obviously meant Happy Tendencies...Dude.
He's basically stipulated that he doesn't like Cowherd. He then takes him on and suggests he has "gay tendencies". How, in any sort of logical conclusion, can you argue that he wasn't projecting a negative connotation to "gay tendencies"?
Yes, when one wants to criticize or insult a person and says he might have "gay tendencies", guess what? That's bigoted/phobic. Because you are putting a negative connotation on exhibiting behaviors that are gay.