HungryLion
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 28,552
- Reaction score
- 64,396
How is it garbage time losing by 3?
lol come on man.
How is it garbage time losing by 3?
If it only took 12 points to best the Saints Dak would’ve had a victory too lol. He needed 50 lol.Come on man….i am mostly a dak supporter but the biggest stat is that hurts team won- against a team we lost to at that. While I defend dak pretty often, these posts are just as hollow as when people say he sucks
This is a horrible post and of course you guy likes from the fan club. Dak didn’t lose the game but if you think he played well 85-90% of the hand you are disingenuous and nit watching the have. Please stop. Hurts also beat a team that took us snd Dak behind the woodshed. PerspectiveHurts
29/38 for 311 yards
0TDs
1 INT
1 Fumble
15-12 (win)
Prescott
28/51
379 yards
2TDs
1 Rush TD
0 INTs
0 Fumbles
28-25 (loss)
Average Cowboys fan concludes that Dak sucks and Hurts is so good.
Dak naysayers don't understand context and can't think critically
I never understood this "Dak Over Dallas" platform of yours.This is really embarrassingly desperate.
This is one of the most cringey things I've seen a Dak over Dallas fan post and that's saying a lot.
The point of the matter is that you can’t come in here and be flexing over stats when the team took an L- hurts won the game, those are the stats that matter and I’m someone who routinely defends dakIf it only took 12 points to best the Saints Dak would’ve had a victory too lol. He needed 50 lol.
Yeah I’m sorry I’m not riding with that. If it’s 28 to 6 in the 4th with 2 minutes left I get it. 28 to 6 and you are 0-2? I don’t think you are letting off the gas.lol come on man.
I don’t think he was flexing I think he was pointing out what it too to beat the Saints. 12 points vs 50 is crazy.The point of the matter is that you can’t come in here and be flexing over stats when the team took an L- hurts won the game, those are the stats that matter and I’m someone who routinely defends dak
Yeah I’m sorry I’m not riding with that. If it’s 28 to 6 in the 4th with 2 minutes left I get it. 28 to 6 and you are 0-2? I don’t think you are letting off the gas.
If it wasn’t a flex why are we Comparing a stat line in a loss to another player?I don’t think he was flexing I think he was pointing out what it too to beat the Saints. 12 points vs 50 is crazy.
When did they play again? Defense sucked all 4th from what I remember.The ravens were in prevent defense. As soon as they had to play again they did and closed the game out.
It was garbage time man
Same thing I noticed. No matter how bad that offend is…they are always a Barkley breakaway touchdown away. This team is missing that and has been since Pollard was healthy.Hurts benefits from guys makin plays for him. Their offense was dead in the water until Barkley took it to the house for their first TD. Then, a short pass to Goeddert went for a 60yd gain. We have no real playmakers on our team.
Also doesn't help his defense gave up 12pts to an offense where we gave up 40 plus. He was never out the game at any time.
Hurts is a very average QB.
When did they play again? Defense sucked all 4th from what I remember.
Everything is garbage time at that point. Hell Cowboys defense was in garbage time too if that’s the case lol
Thought he was just comparing the two. Neither is in any position to flex.If it wasn’t a flex why are we Comparing a stat line in a loss to another player?
I never once said that lol. I just had that lazy opinion of “defense let them do it”. I don’t think it’s as simple and as basic as that.Dude you cant honestly think the offense wasn’t a big problem today. You honestly in your heart can’t believe that.