Lies.
Yes, to prove your biases.
LOL...dude. Lastyear: 407 of 540 passes for 4,500 yards and 41 touchdowns.
You made yourself look foolish with that one.
Again 1 year how does this make Baker the model, I would get Allen, Mahomes and so on...Baker has flashed 1 year. I dont think he is the model for consistancy..could he be after this year..maybe he looks good. you didnt call Dak the model after 2023 its again kinda wierd to me to use Baker.
Dak was the worst player on the field for that GB game.
lol man he didnt play well the first half for sure but there were MANY on defense who got killed the whole game like every play. You can say it was Dak but your skipping 8 consecutive drives for scores the defense gave up...8 drives in a playioff game.
Playoff record?
None of those other guys are paid like Dak, and everybody knows the QB is the most critical position in all of sports, especially in the playoffs.
so every loss in the NFL is on the QB as he is making the money? That doesnt make sense. That logic means mistakes are ok if your money is lower, i get you dont like Dak's contract but that doesnt obsolve everyone else on the team of doing thier job.
Wait...why do you keep changing what I said? You keep taking me WAY off my point/
As Ihave been trying to tell you....no not every loss...nor every win...is all on the QB.
If a 20mill a year Edge rusher gets whipped every play in a playoff game and the other team score 40 but the QB throws a pick and scores 20 ....which one sucked more depends on how much they get payed?
No CeeDee was... and come to think of it.. neither of them was as bad as half the guys on defense.
This whole "Dak sucked worse because he gets paid____" is a crazy argument, players dont play better or worse in a game because of what they get payed...
Yeah it is absolute insanity. If anything once guys get the bag then end up pressing to live up to the contract so for many we should expect a dip in play when a guy gets a big payday. We should count ourselves fortunate that guys like Dak and CeeDee appear to have been completely unfazed by getting the big money.
To me its simple a players play is what it is, a players play vs his value (did he over or under play his contract) is a direct rerflection of your GM...the pay doesnt effect the players play grade at all it effects the GM's grade
LOL....Good enough to win what? It's only been 5 games. Dak has played well. He has in the past. Just not good enough when it counts. We have history to see that.
