Dak, Dak, Dak, it’s exhausting!

[baltcowboy]

Keyshawn is a good voice of reason. Skip gets to be the stupid anti-Cowboy guy again because Keyshawn and Mike are pro Cowboys with Mike being the homer and Keyshawn being more realistic. Good for Keyshawn...I guess Skip doesn't mind looking like a idiot.

Why is Rush even a topic that had to have come straight form Skip lol.

At first I thought it was a board joke but now I believe these yahoos come to our board for topic discussions. Especially Skip and Acho.

 

[kskboys]

There are some fair guys here i'd probably put you in there as a fair Dak critic. But then you have guys who just offer nothing to this site other than a anti Dak take. If the Cowboys win they don't show up. They lose its back to their anti-Dak role. Now I don't know about banning them because realistically while they are technically trolling you can't really prove that.

Goes both ways. There are about the same number of posters on either side who offer nothing to the site besides attacks and endlessly talking about others.

 

[G2]

You don't go on emotional rants??? OMG! You're full of caca! You need to seek help. If you truly believe that you're more ignorant than I thought.


I questioned you? Where?? Go ahead and bench me then.

You're not going to get any football discussion past the 4th grade with forum members who do nothing but call Dallas fans Dak fans (for some weird reason) over, and over.
What a contribution!

 

[kskboys]

Of course I don’t agree with anyone “wishing someone dead”( which I have never seen here) . But we have to rely on the mods to make these decisions.

as far as “ playing for my team”, thats a load of Bull.

I can quickly give you one example of that. Since Trey Lance was signed there have been a group of people that have beating y’all over the head with it saying that he will take Daks job. If I’m on that “ team” wouldn’t I jump on that bandwagon??

But no, I have been against signing Trey since day 1 because he simply hasn’t shown any ability to play in this league in the last 3 years with the Niners.

I know it’s hard for the Dak Protectors to understand but some if us look at things OBJECTIVELY and want to be real about what’s we think is best for this team.

In summation, just because a poster agrees with one opinion of a poster doesn’t mean that agree with everything else they espouse.

Right?

And just because I want Dak to play better, doesn't mean that he will. At this point, I've more in the vein of espousing building up the D and using a good running game. That's the obvious way we need to go at this point.

 

[Vtwin]

"Talking about Dak is exhausting, better start a thread about Dak" - Chuck 54

One sentence mentioned Dak. The rest of the post was dedicated to his main point of being interested in how the defense performs.

The thread isn't about Dak at all. Just the opposite, in fact.

 

[TheMightyVanHalen]

Who said they wanted Dak to get injured or get in a plane crash?????

Dak fans literally live in their own world lolololol

I have the screenshots. Several people have seen them in my PMs. I won't get anyone in trouble but two has commented here on this post. If they want to back me up, that's on them to do.

 

[CCBoy]

The quarterback needs to do it more importantly.

Who was missing for a whole half of a game, on what you referenced, the San Francisco game? The leading runner for Dallas. Did that affect the passing game and put the quarterback at a definite disadvantage from a very good defense? Without doubt it did.

Now what effect did a very weak receiver group then affect as to the passing game of the Dallas game.

No, you have been ignoring all of these real and strong change in team ability. It puts them out of their game. Momentum then changes...yet you continue to go back to your chosen element of describing player play. Then you again instead hang demeaning on what now is no more than a fan whipping boy.

Sorry, I don't walk your road at all...I don't live behind ignoring you, just judging value in what is said by YOU.

 

[G2]

It d

Goes both ways. There are about the same number of posters on either side who offer nothing to the site besides attacks and endlessly talking about others.

Depends on what annoys you the most. I find Ultra-Homer fans, while silly, WAY more tolerable people.

 

[kskboys]

That president of the Anti-Dak/Cowboys Cult, the one who seen your post and immediately commented, he has almost 23,000 posts while being here only a few years. 99 percent of his posts are anit-Dak/Cowboys. Ban him and a 1/4 of that nonsense goes away. He's never even been benched for his antics, that I'm aware of. He's not even a donor here so I have no idea why he's allowed to do what he does. I take that back. I think I do know why.

Then ask yourself: "Does he break the rules?"

That's what people get benched for, not for giving viewpoints that someone doesn't like.

 

[shabazz]

can’t we just get that dam “ Dak Only “ sub-forum so this can stop creating undue divisvenes?


Oh yeah, I forgot…….this crap brings more foot traffic for ads

 

[kskboys]

It d

Depends on what annoys you the most. I find Ultra-Homer fans, while silly, WAY more tolerable people.

Of course. However, I am on neither side of the equation, so both are pretty bad. The constant personal attacks and squabbling take a great deal away from an otherwise awesome board.

 

[kskboys]

You're not going to get any football discussion past the 4th grade with forum members who do nothing but call Dallas fans Dak fans (for some weird reason) over, and over.
What a contribution!

Or the positive side either.

 

[MountaineerCowboy]

I have the screenshots. Several people have seen them in my PMs. I won't get anyone in trouble but two has commented here on this post. If they want to back me up, that's on them to do.

You brought that up when referencing me though making it look like I said those things.

I think you should post them so my name don’t get attached to junk like that.

 

[shabazz]

It d

Depends on what annoys you the most. I find Ultra-Homer fans, while silly, WAY more tolerable people.

I agree,. way easier to tolerate Utopian Pollyannas…..every day is bliss and inconsequential

……until we get a 4-1 Cooper Rush winning streak or Trey Lance getting signed…..then it becomes DEFCON 5 with them.

 

[TheMarathonContinues]

Talking about facts presented. If cause is bias instead of application, that is added in comment.

I spend a lot of time presently on facts being presented and sourced. That is my direction...not giggling at agenda stereotypes.

What Agenda stereotypes you keep saying this?

 

[rnr_honeybadger]

What should Mike and Brain do that Linehan, Garrett, and Moore didn’t do?

I suspect that Mike and Brian started looking at what Dak was capable of and they found out real fast that the offense will have to be severely limited.

 

[shabazz]

You brought that up when referencing me though making it look like I said those things.

I think you should post them so my name don’t get attached to junk like that.

Yeah, I mistakenly thought he was referring to you, but that seemed 180 of how you conduct yourself.

It was him referencing “ almost 23,000 posts” and since you have 22, 900………

 

[jazzcat22]

STOP THE ARGUING AND INSULTS. I WILL BE TIRED OF DELETING THE POSTS HERE ALREADY AS I NEED TO GO BACK THROUGH THIS THREAD NOW.
NEXT ONE WILL BE FURTHER ACTION THAN A THREAD BAN.

 

[MountaineerCowboy]

Yeah, I mistakenly thought he was referring to you, but that seemed 180 of how you conduct yourself.

anybody would think that he was talking about me.

I don’t say junk like that.

 

[kskboys]

One sentence mentioned Dak. The rest of the post was dedicated to his main point of being interested in how the defense performs.

The thread isn't about Dak at all. Just the opposite, in fact.

Yup. It's been proven time after time that you can't even mention Dak in passing in a thread. Brings out the Retreads w/ their constant inane repetitions.