Your point has no logic behind it.
The cowboys were some highly talented squad that only went 4-12 because Romo was hurt.
Yet, Romo never played again. And instead Dak goes 13-3 the next year.
That’s the point. The cowboys were a bad team the prior year. You can’t use the Romo reason when the next season they go 13-3 without Romo playing a meaningful snap.
Therefore the insinuation that the cowboys roster was somehow better than other teams that draft high, doesn’t really fly. Not without actually comparing rosters.
It’s also not really accurate to try and say Dak has had a better roster compared to the others drafted with him.
The eagles won a super bowl without wentz.
We all know how talented the rams team is.
So the argument itself is moot from the start. Goff and wentz aren’t playing on bad teams.
The chiefs and Texans also made the playoffs with different QB’a before drafting their guys.
So again there is no basis in fact that Dak somehow made it into a significantly better team than others drafted in the relatively same time span.