Dak Just Doesn't Have It!

Vtwin

Safety third
Messages
8,665
Reaction score
12,121
Modern man is hypnotized by the Talking Head Media. Many gravitate to and hold fast to the opinions of those idiots. Unable to be subjective they fall in line like the living dead.

They believe none of what they see and believe only what they choose to hear
Ain't that the truth!
 

GINeric

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,736
Reaction score
3,898
I’m not a Dak hater! He does all the right things as far as being a leader, being a good influence & citizen, work ethic etc. But I’ve said this before & here it comes again, he doesn’t have that IT and now on top of that, his arm strength is showing real signs of weakness!
First the arm strength. Its been very evident in the 1st two games as he’s not comfortable throwing intermediate to long throws hard & we’re now seeing check down Charlie! He’s been too apt to try to finess it in which doesn’t work in the NFL.
Second, everyone has a choking point, except the great ones! Dak has shown to play great in mostly home games against inferior teams but when he is up against tougher teams when he’s needed most, he’s most of the time a big nothing burger!
The Cowboys should have let him play out this season, paid him the 55 million & moved on! But now we’re stuck for the next 5-6 years with a Dak who’s not going to get better but only worse! The Cowboys need to start drafting QB’s every year and if they end up with Dak & his 60 million on the bench, so be it!!

So let me ask you this.... how does a quarterback who "doesn't have it" continue to be a perennial top 10 quarterback and become an All-Pro and a MVP candidate in a one dimensional offense WITHOUT a functioning running game???

Give me a few names of other quarterbacks who "doesn't have it" have been top 10 their whole career, and became an All-Pro and MVP candidate in a one dimensional offense WITHOUT a functioning running game to aid them.

I'll wait for those names....
 

triplets_93

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,982
Reaction score
6,458
I agree. We need to go find a new troy aikman. Someone special that can be the reason we win games.
The Propaganda from the Organization is how Dak is an invaluable Leader of team.

No, the Dallas Cowboys need a QB that is a True Leader, like an Aikman or a Staubach.

Everything else is window dressing for a Jones Family Sales & Marketing Empire.
 

GINeric

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,736
Reaction score
3,898
Ok we can pay a QB but lets find one 1st? And in the mean time lets allocate the 60 million to other parts of the team.

Dak is a dime a dozen and there is absolutely no reason to break the bank to keep him

That's fair. But if Dak is a dime a dozen.... why haven't most NFL teams found a 4th round quarterback who's outplayed many quarterbacks drafted higher than him?

How many other dime a dozen quarterbacks are out there that has never had a losing record, been a top 10 quarterback their whole career, became All Pro and an MVP candidate without the aid of a functioning running game??

Where are these dime a dozen quarterbacks who've done these things and why aren't they on a roster? I'm sure Carolina, NY Giants, Cleveland, LV, Pittsburgh and a few other teams would love to have a dime a dozen quarterback like that, correct?
 

IceStar-D7

Well-Known Member
Messages
9,286
Reaction score
8,352
Some fans are just incredible :facepalm: Did you see Mahomes stats yesterday? Way worse then Dak's. But Mahomes has two things Dak doesn't have. A great defense and a great Head coach/ OC. Especially when the game is on the line. The plays called by McCarthy yesterday for our offense was laughable, If Kansas defense gave up 40 point's to the Bengals. What do you think the final score would of been. If you don't like Dak-fine. But to say we're going to win with any other quarterback. And that includes Mahomes. It's LAUGHABLE:lmao:
 

GINeric

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,736
Reaction score
3,898
Some fans are just incredible :facepalm: Did you see Mahomes stats yesterday? Way worse then Dak's. But Mahomes has two things Dak doesn't have. A great defense and a great Head coach OC. The plays called by McCarthy yesterday for our offense was laughable, If Kansas defense gave up 40 point's to the Bengals. What do you think the final score would of been. If you don't like Dak-fine. But to say we're going to win with any other quarterback. And that includes Mahomes. It's LAUGHABLE:lmao:

Sam Darnold carved up the great 49ers defense...... nobody saying nothing about that tho huh....
 

SteveTheCowboy

Well-Known Member
Messages
22,121
Reaction score
16,168
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
no chance is a super star....but he can get us top 3 pick easily.
I'm very surprised you don't run your own nfl team. So very aggressive about how your opinion is super bowl caliber.

In reality you are no more gifted than the rest of us shlubs you mock and ridicule. You just haven't realized it yet.

Maybe on your death bed? Not that I want that to happen soon. We can suffer through it I am sure!
 

Frozen700

Well-Known Member
Messages
17,505
Reaction score
6,467
You want censorship, is that it?

Don't call out the mods, not nice of you.
That’s what it sounds like .

If that’s the case, when he has a good game don’t run off making threads of how “good” he is.
 

Wangchung83

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,907
Reaction score
1,405
They scored 16 in the first half, which normally is a solid output… when you aren’t allowing 35 points in a half.
They didn’t score 16 the kicker scored 9 points meaning offense stalled. The only time you can say an offense doesn’t put up >16 points in half which again they didn’t do, that team invests either equally or more in defense. You’re asking for Steelers, 49ers type of defense but here’s the problem, those teams spend more on defense than offense. Want proof
 

Wangchung83

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,907
Reaction score
1,405
So let me ask you this.... how does a quarterback who "doesn't have it" continue to be a perennial top 10 quarterback and become an All-Pro and a MVP candidate in a one dimensional offense WITHOUT a functioning running game???

Give me a few names of other quarterbacks who "doesn't have it" have been top 10 their whole career, and became an All-Pro and MVP candidate in a one dimensional offense WITHOUT a functioning running game to aid them.

I'll wait for those names....
Stupid arguments bc this assumes Dan has always not had a run game, oline, or how bad he has played against good teams. It assumes he has a top ten season with his current roster which he won’t bc he doesn’t elevate others, he plays within the system. Think 2018 before signing cooper, dak wouldn’t have cracked top 20 without the addition. He’ll be below top 20 this year, want to bet on it?
 

windward

NFL Historian
Messages
18,642
Reaction score
4,513
They didn’t score 16 the kicker scored 9 points meaning offense stalled. The only time you can say an offense doesn’t put up >16 points in half which again they didn’t do, that team invests either equally or more in defense. You’re asking for Steelers, 49ers type of defense but here’s the problem, those teams spend more on defense than offense. Want proof

“They didn’t score 16. They scored 16.”

Got it.
 

Yobwocs

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,259
Reaction score
4,506
You keep believing that and get in line for the next jersey sale.
He got 16 points in the first half. All the Top QBs made tons of mistakes. BURROW, Jackson, Mahomes, Allen, and Stafford. All of them were far from perfect but they're still gonna have people saying they're Top 5.

Dak made the least mistakes of any of these in the first half except Allen - but he got help from Tua being bad.

Was he perfect? No. Nobody ever is. In the 2nd half more mistakes started to pile on but I'm sure his haters are gonna complain about garbage time if he threw 2 more touchdowns in a losing effort so what's the point if he's never gonna satisfy you?

Game was over when McCarthy didn't call TimeOut on the 3rd and 4 when CD got dinged. And when the defense gave up 3rd and 8 and subsequently a touchdown...the score went from 35-19 to 41-19. What's the point after that?
 
Top