Most of those turnovers were because the team was behind and Dak was doing everything he could to win.
Let's see:
vs. ATL
Dak fumbled in the 1st Quarter with the game tied 0-0 (this turnover led to an ATL TD)
vs. SEA
Dak threw an INT in the 2nd Quarter with SEA leading 16-15 (this turnover led to a SEA TD)
Dak fumbled to start the 3rd Quarter with SEA leading 23-15 (this turnover led to a SEA TD)
Dak threw an INT late in the 4th Quarter with SEA leading 38-31 (this ended the game)
vs. CLE
Dak fumbled in the 2nd Quarter with the game tied 14-14 (this turnover led to a CLE TD)
Dak threw an INT late in the 4th Quarter with CLE leading 49-38 (this ended the game)
vs. NYG
Dak threw an INT in the 1st Quarter with the NYG leading 7-3 (this turnover was a Pick 6 TD)
So your claim is that "most of those turnovers were because the team was behind and Dak was doing everything he could to win" yet when you look at the FACTS (and not just making an statement based on Dak love emotions) you will see clearly that in 6 out of the 7 turnovers Dak committed the team was actually tied or within one score when he committed the turnovers. In addition, 5 of the 7 turnovers led to an immediate TD by the opposing team and the other 2 turnovers ended the game.
So, do you care to correct your FALSE statement???????