MyFairLady
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 5,433
- Reaction score
- 6,581
Also Rogers didn't have to deal with the glare through the window like Dak does.
Yeah those 3rd stringers were a challenge.Dak destroyed Jalen.
And the rest of the Eagles. Twice this season.
Analysis complete!
Rodgers has also gotten some meals in DallasFriendly reminder that the 49ers had -10 yards 24 minutes into the game. If that was the case against the Cowboys, we would’ve blown them completely out of the damn building. So once again its not ALL on Dak, and Aaron Rodgers might be slightly better than Dak but it’s not some crazy distance between the 2. Rodgers has made a living and a name feasting off of the Bears, Lions, and Vikings. Other than that he’s a good QB but Dak has proven what he can do when the defense shows up like the Packers D showed up tonight.
If we played the 9ers 10 times we’d win 8 times, guaranteed.
It's not fair, that's the point. These stupid comparisons need to stop altogether. There are so many variables with each team, in each game, and the whole 'Rodgers would've made that throw' is a very common and stupid thing ppl say here.
Players should be evaluated on their own merits. But that's not what happens on this board
I honestly believe that if Dak had played better against the 9ers, we win that game easily. Just look what happens when the light finally comes on in the third or fourth quarter. If Dak could be consistently as good as he usually is in the second half of games, he'd be a very good QB, and I think we could make it to the big game...or at least we could have this year. With the way this team is probably going to be cannibalized in the off season, next year is probably off the table.Dak was having an MVP season until he injured his calf. I don’t think any QB can win a Super Bowl with the Cowboys. Their issues are a lot deeper than how Dak played the final half of the season.
Ok.....if that matters to you. We are both home now......watching.
Both played like CRAP when it counted. Dak just stank less.
Is it a fair comparison though when one team was playing outdoors in 6 degree snow and the other was decidedly not that? We saw the effect the cold was having on that game and that was a substantial variable that affected both sides.
Don't make it so obvious and go out of your way to pile on Dallas, it makes no sense and will bring you no joy.I am surprised you are falling into this trap too. You typically are rational and have some common sense.
LOL.
The rationalizations for Prescott are getting epic now.
rogers had beter defense its team game and by that measure i think dak would have won..no one knows but our defense allowed them to score at will in the first half and we had to play catchup. GB was leading most of the game and never behind until the FG winning scoreResult was the same though, which is what matters.
Dak and Rodgers both failed.
Either way it's mediocrity and I bet if you ask Rodgers, he's not happy with that at all. Chances are, he may end up in a 9ers uniform and next year will even be more of a beat down because all they really need is a QB.Dak led the offense to 16 points against San Francisco.
Rodgers was only able to put up 10.
Analyze that Dak haters!
Well that’s my point, the comparison is stupid.
That being said, Rodgers is a better QB than Dak and yes, he can make some throws Dak can’t. He has one of the best pure arms in the NFL still.
I can’t believe we are having this discussion.
LOL, it’s not about making excuses for him.
It’s about using some common sense when trying to argue that Dak is better because he score 16 points in perfect conditions compared to Rodgers in horrible conditions.
Dak led the offense to 16 points against San Francisco.
Rodgers was only able to put up 10.
Analyze that Dak haters!
if we had won...we would've played the bucs.Guessing if we beat the 49ers we would have beaten packers. Just one play away. Or a few less penalties. Or the Wilson to Pollard pass was complete. Did Pollard even see the pass coming..