Cowfan75
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 6,960
- Reaction score
- 7,769
Yes back in 1995.
Much more recently, during the Age of the Clapper.
Yes back in 1995.
Dak and Dalton play on the same team so it is not a vs and any real fan of football realizes this. The obvious is that we would have scored more than 10 points with Dak which in itself would have given us a better chance to win.....this is either true or its not. Again they both play for us but we clearly are not the same with Dalton at QB and to say we are is just ridiculous.The conversation continues to be dak vs dalton, but the truth is you lose tonight with either QB. The supporting cast needs to be better
Whilst I am not a Dak-Stan, I do respect his play. I'd bet my paycheck they wouldn't have blitzed Dak the same way.I saw nowhere where Dak would have improved anything.
Every single aspect was garbage.
The Cards were aggressive and physical, and the Cowboys were just a punching bag. These boys need to find their manhood.
Another genius. Under Dak we average 37 points a game. Yah, lets get rid of that guy!!!!
Better protection, better performance by receivers, softer defenses (AZ never backed off like other teams did).
Dalton wasn't great. Didn't say he was. But Dak makes zero difference in that game. You're fooling yourself if you think he would have.
Kidding me are you kidding me. Prescott’s the only good thing about this franchise. And everybody knows it now except for the delusionI saw nowhere where Dak would have improved anything.
Every single aspect was garbage.
The Cards were aggressive and physical, and the Cowboys were just a punching bag. These boys need to find their manhood.
You just lost any integrity when it comes to evaluating players if you had any to start withThat was a lot more than Dak making that difference.
What was shown tonight was how bad this team really is. Dak by himself may make them mediocre at best. We need talent at so many positions I cannot see how we can afford Dak and still field a competitive team.
Sorry, it strikes me as fundamental madness and cap suicide to pay a 100m+ (35+ per) to QB that has won nare a playoff game. Brady, Brees, Rodgers, Mahomes, Wilson sure. They have reputations and have proven themselves.
Once you devote that much of your cap to the QB position YOU HAD BETTER GET IT RIGHT because that cap percentage is going to limit your ability to stockpile talent elsewhere.
Wow, you are so smart. We average 37 points a game with that guy and still lose.
Guess you forgot that part. And the part where he will be 20% of the cap space next year leaving no room to add talent.
Oh there you are. I have to ask you. How was that Grand Canyon of a drop off?And that's the problem...
The inability to deal with adversity, come from behind to put your team to win, the leadership
Dak May have increased his value by just going down
even the fellas in espn were pointing out the obvious
Straw man.so does every other quarterback in the nfl. dak makes a huge amount of them though. more than most. this year, more than everyone. the guy somehow had this horrific team within striking distance in every game. that's flat out impressive.
Maybe, and they would have been stupid not to.Whilst I am not a Dak-Stan, I do respect his play. I'd bet my paycheck they wouldn't have blitzed Dak the same way.
You're describing potential flaws in the other players. If that is the makeup of these players, they will never win anything.I honestly can't believe that you believe Dak makes no difference.
If nothing else, this game makes it look like the players play much harder for Dak than Dalton. You completely dismissed (or missed) Dak's mental influence on his teammates.
Dak makes a huge difference when he's in there.